| Literature DB >> 28902374 |
Xin Liu1, Simone Latkolik2, Atanas G Atanasov2,3, Olaf Kunert4, Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig1, Elke H Heiss2, Clemens Malainer2, Andreas Schinkovitz1, Manfred Kollroser5, Verena M Dirsch2, Rudolf Bauer1.
Abstract
The roots of Bupleurum chinense have a long history in traditional medicine to treat infectious diseases and inflammatory disorders. Two major compounds, saikosaponins A and D, were reported to exert potent anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting NF-κB. In the present study, we isolated new saikosaponin analogues from the roots of B. chinese interfering with NF-κB activity in vitro. The methanol-soluble fraction of the dichloromethane extract of Radix Bupleuri was subjected to activity-guided isolation yielding 18 compounds, including triterpenoids and polyacetylenes. Their structures were determined by spectroscopic methods as saikogenin D (1), prosaikogenin D (2), saikosaponins B2 (3), W (4), B1 (5), Y (6), D (7), A (8), E (9), B4 (10), B3 (11), and T (12), saikodiyne A (13), D (14), E (15) and F (16), falcarindiol (17), and 1-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (18). Among them, 4, 15, and 16 are new compounds, whereas 6, previously described as a semi-synthetic compound, is isolated from a natural source for the first time, and 13-17 are the first reports of polyacetylenes from this plant. Nine saponins/triterpenoids were tested for inhibition of NF-κB signaling in a cell-based NF-κB-dependent luciferase reporter gene model in vitro. Five of them (1, 2, 4, 6, and 8) showed strong (> 50%, at 30 µM) NF-κB inhibition, but also varying degrees of cytotoxicity, with compounds 1 and 4 (showing no significant cytotoxicity) presenting IC50 values of 14.0 µM and 14.1 µM in the cell-based assay, respectively. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28902374 PMCID: PMC6193276 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-118226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Planta Med ISSN: 0032-0943 Impact factor: 3.352
Fig. 1Structures of compounds 1 – 18 isolated from B. chinense .
Fig. 2a NF- κ B inhibition by selected compounds isolated from B. chinense detected in an in vitro cell-based luciferase assay. Luciferase activity (relative units to the internal control CTG fluorescence) are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, Dunnettʼs test, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ns: not significant) and are normalized to the solvent control DMSO (0.1%). b Cells were stained with CTG 1 h before treatment of cells with the indicated compounds for 4 h. Relative fluorescence units were measured directly before measuring the NF- κ B-dependent luciferase activity and are displayed here normalized to the solvent control DMSO (0.1%). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t-test, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ns: not significant).
Fig. 3Concentration-response curves of NF- κ B inhibition by B. chinese compound 1 and compound 4 .
Table 1 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopic data (in CD 3 OD) of compounds 4 and 6 in Hz.
| 4 | 6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | 1.88 (1H) 1.02 (1H) | 39.4 | 1.87 (1H) 0.94 (1H) | 39.2 |
| 2 | 1.95 (1H) 1.75 (1H) | 27.0 |
1.96 (1H)
1.80 (1H,
| 26.1 |
| 3 |
3.18 (1H,
| 90.6 | 3.63 (H-3) | 83.0 |
| 4 | 40.3 | 44.1 | ||
| 5 | 0.85 (1H) | 56.7 | 1.21 (1H) | 48.0 |
| 6 | 1.64 (1H) 1.46 (1H) | 19.4 | 1.54 (2H) | 18.1 |
| 7 | 1.38 (2H) | 33.4 | 1.50 (1H) 1.14 (1H) | 32.0 |
| 8 | 41.9 | 43.0 | ||
| 9 |
1.99 (1H,
| 54.8 | 1.91 (1H) | 53.8 |
| 10 | 37.5 | 37.1 | ||
| 11 |
5.58 (1H,
| 127.1 |
6.04 (1H,
| 134.6 |
| 12 |
6.45 (1H,
| 126.7 |
5.53 (1H,
| 129.6 |
| 13 | 137.2 | 85.6 | ||
| 14 | 42.3 | 50.9 | ||
| 15 | 1.93 (1H) 1.41 (1H) | 32.0 |
2.79 (1H,
| 45.4 |
| 16 |
4.03 (1H,
| 69.1 | 214.8 | |
| 17 | 45.4 | 57.4 | ||
| 18 | 132.7 |
2.28 (1H,
| 56.3 | |
| 19 |
2.48 (1H,
| 39.4 | 1.55 (1H) 1.43 (1H) | 40.0 |
| 20 | 33.2 | 32.4 | ||
| 21 | 1.56 (1H) 1.30 (1H) | 35.8 | 1.51 (1H) 1.24 (1H) | 36.6 |
| 22 | 2.01 (1H) 1.61 (1H) | 24.5 | 2.11 (1H) 1.26 (1H) | 25.1 |
| 23 |
1.06 (3H,
| 28.2 | 3.67 (1H) 3.29 (1H) | 64.7 |
| 24 |
0.84 (3H,
| 16.5 |
0.71 (3H,
| 12.7 |
| 25 |
0.92 (3H,
| 18.6 |
0.98 (3H,
| 18.8 |
| 26 |
0.73 (3H,
| 17.5 |
1.21 (3H,
| 20.1 |
| 27 |
1.23 (3H,
| 22.1 |
1.02 (3H,
| 20.7 |
| 28 |
3.74 (1H,
| 65.1 |
3.90 (
| 76.3 |
| 29 |
0.85 (3H,
| 25.3 |
0.93 (3H,
| 33.8 |
| 30 |
0.97 (3H,
| 32.9 |
0.90 (3H,
| 23.5 |
|
| ||||
| 1′ |
4.32 (1H,
| 106.6 |
4.38 (1H,
| 105.7 |
| 2′ | 3.67 (1H) | 71.9 | 3.65 (1H) | 71.9 |
| 3′ |
3.60 (1H,
| 84.9 | 3.60 (1H) | 85.2 |
| 4′ | 3.85 (1H) | 72.4 | 3.85 (1H) | 72.3 |
| 5′ | 3.64 (1H) | 71.2 | 3.66 (1H) | 71.3 |
| 6′ |
1.26 (3H,
| 16.9 |
1.27 (3H,
| 16.9 |
|
| ||||
| 1″ |
4.55 (1H,
| 105.6 |
4.53 (
| 105.7 |
| 2″ | 3.28 (1H) | 75.4 | 3.29 (1H) | 75.4 |
| 3″ | 3.37 (1H) | 77.7 | 3.36 (1H) | 77.7 |
| 4″ | 3.32 (1H) | 71.3 | 3.33 (1H) | 71.2 |
| 5″ | 3.28 (1H) | 77.9 | 3.28 (1H) | 77.9 |
| 6″ | 3.84 (1H) 3.67 (1H) | 62.5 |
3.84 (1H,
| 62.4 |
Table 2 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopic data (in CD 3 OD) of compounds 15 and 16 in Hz.
| 15 | 16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 |
3.63 (2H, t,
| 61.4 |
4.30 (2H, dd,
| 61.1 |
| 2 |
1.73 (2H, p,
| 32.3 |
6.23 (1H, dt,
| 147.8 |
| 3 |
2.42 (2H, t,
| 16.6 |
5.63 (1H, d,
| 109.1 |
| 4 | 84.2 | 75.1 | ||
| 5 | 66.2 | 79.4 | ||
| 6 | 75.3 | 69.0 | ||
| 7 | 74.1 | 85.1 | ||
| 8 |
5.71 (1H, d,
| 109.0 |
5.19 (1H, d,
| 59.0 |
| 9 |
6.24 (1H, dd,
| 150.7 |
5.47 (1H, ddt,
| 129.8 |
| 10 |
4.08 (1H, qd,
| 72.6 |
5.56 (1H, dtd,
| 134.1 |
| 11 |
1.49 (2H, q,
| 37.9 |
2.13 (2H, q,
| 28.5 |
| 12 | 1.41 (1H) 1.32 (1H) | 26.2 |
1.41 (2H, p,
| 30.1 |
| 13 | 1.30 (2H) | 32.9 | 1.32 (2H) | 32.5 |
| 14 | 1.33 (2H) | 23.7 | 1.33 (2H) | 23.6 |
| 15 |
0.91 (3H, t,
| 14.4 |
0.91 (3H, t,
| 14.4 |