Literature DB >> 28901637

PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy in the initial evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in various pediatric malignancies.

Claudia P Zapata1,2, Branko Cuglievan3,2, Catalina M Zapata4,2, Raquel Olavarrieta5,2, Scott Raskin5,2, Kavita Desai6,2, Guillermo De Angulo6,2.   

Abstract

Accurate staging is essential in the prognosis and management of pediatric malignancies. Current protocols require screening for marrow infiltration with bone marrow biopsy (BMB) as the gold standard. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is commonly used to complete the staging process and can also be used to evaluate marrow infiltration.
OBJECTIVE: To compare PET-CT and BMB in the initial evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in pediatric cancers. DESIGN/
METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed new cases of EWS, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and lymphoma diagnosed between January 2009 and October 2014. Each case had undergone both PET-CT and BMB within 4 weeks without treatment in the interval between screening modalities.
RESULTS: We reviewed 69 cases. Bone marrow infiltration was demonstrated in 34 cases by PET-CT and in 18 cases by BMB. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of PET-CT were both 100%. Interestingly, the cases in which infiltration was not detected on BMB had an abnormal marrow signal on PET-CT focal or distant to iliac crest.
CONCLUSION: PET-CT has a high sensitivity when assessing marrow infiltration in pediatric malignancies. Advances in radiologic modalities may obviate the use of invasive, painful, and costly procedures like BMB. Furthermore, biopsy results are limited by insufficient tissue or the degree of marrow infiltration (diffuse vs. focal disease). PET-CT can improve the precision of biopsy when used as a guiding tool. This study proposes the use of PET-CT as first-line screening for bone marrow infiltration to improve the accuracy of staging in new diagnoses.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; bone marrow biopsy; marrow infiltration; pediatric cancer; staging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28901637     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  6 in total

Review 1.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) for the detection of bone, lung, and lymph node metastases in rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Bas Vaarwerk; Willemijn B Breunis; Lianne M Haveman; Bart de Keizer; Nina Jehanno; Lise Borgwardt; Rick R van Rijn; Henk van den Berg; Jérémie F Cohen; Elvira C van Dalen; Johannes Hm Merks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-09

2.  Diagnostic Value of Seven Different Imaging Modalities for Patients with Neuroblastic Tumors: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yanfeng Xu; Ying Kan; Wei Wang; Jigang Yang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomics nomogram could predict bone marrow involvement in pediatric neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Lijuan Feng; Xu Yang; Xia Lu; Ying Kan; Chao Wang; Dehui Sun; Hui Zhang; Wei Wang; Jigang Yang
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-09-04

4.  Bone marrow particle enrichment analysis for the laboratory diagnosis of multiple myeloma: A case study.

Authors:  Congming Zhang; Yanan Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET(CT) in Bone-Bone Marrow Involvement in Pediatric Neuroblastoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lixin Sun; Bingye Zhang; Ruchen Peng
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  FDG-PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy in bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed paediatric lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhizhuo Li; Chengxin Li; Bingrong Chen; Lijun Shi; Fuqiang Gao; Peixu Wang; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.