Jean-Baptiste Cazauran1, Mohammad Alyami2,3,4,5, Antoinette Lasseur1, Isabo Gybels1,6, Olivier Glehen1,7, Naoual Bakrin1,7. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. swar_ms@hotmail.com. 3. EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. swar_ms@hotmail.com. 4. King Abdullah Scholarship Program, Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau, Paris, France. swar_ms@hotmail.com. 5. Département de chirurgie viscérale et oncologique, Hopital Lyon Sud, 65 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France. swar_ms@hotmail.com. 6. Erasmus Scholarship Program, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 7. EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common evolution of abdominal cancers and is associated with poor prognosis in the absence of aggressive multimodal therapy.1 Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a safe and innovative approach, which enhances the effect of chemotherapy 2 without reported renal/hepatic toxicity.3,4 It requires mastery of technical aspects to reduce postoperative morbidity, increase effectiveness, and prevent caregiver chemotherapy exposure. We, therefore, report herein the surgical protocol after 2 years of implementation in our university center specialized in PC management, accompanied by a short video, to share our experience. METHODS: The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and capnoperitoneum (12 mmHg, 37 °C) using two balloon trocars placed in the midline, in accordance with the open laparoscopic technique. Explorative laparoscopy allowed Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index to be determined. Parietal biopsies were taken, and ascites was removed for peritoneal cytology. The nebulizer was inserted and connected to a high-pressure injector. A pressurized aerosol containing chemotherapy agents was then administered; cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2 in 150 ml 0.9%NaCl) immediately followed by doxorubicin (1.5 mg/m2 in 50 ml 0.9%NaCl), or oxaliplatin alone (92 mg/m2 in 150 ml 0.9%NaCl), based on PC origin and chemotherapy history. The aerosol was kept in a steady-state for 30 min then exhausted through a closed filter system, and trocars were retracted. Each step is illustrated in the video. CONCLUSION: This video protocol provides a better understanding of the PIPAC procedure and the safety measures essential for this method of chemotherapy administration. It should help all teams wishing to implement a PIPAC therapy program.
BACKGROUND:Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common evolution of abdominal cancers and is associated with poor prognosis in the absence of aggressive multimodal therapy.1 Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a safe and innovative approach, which enhances the effect of chemotherapy 2 without reported renal/hepatic toxicity.3,4 It requires mastery of technical aspects to reduce postoperative morbidity, increase effectiveness, and prevent caregiver chemotherapy exposure. We, therefore, report herein the surgical protocol after 2 years of implementation in our university center specialized in PC management, accompanied by a short video, to share our experience. METHODS: The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and capnoperitoneum (12 mmHg, 37 °C) using two balloon trocars placed in the midline, in accordance with the open laparoscopic technique. Explorative laparoscopy allowed Sugarbaker peritoneal cancer index to be determined. Parietal biopsies were taken, and ascites was removed for peritoneal cytology. The nebulizer was inserted and connected to a high-pressure injector. A pressurized aerosol containing chemotherapy agents was then administered; cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2 in 150 ml 0.9%NaCl) immediately followed by doxorubicin (1.5 mg/m2 in 50 ml 0.9%NaCl), or oxaliplatin alone (92 mg/m2 in 150 ml 0.9%NaCl), based on PC origin and chemotherapy history. The aerosol was kept in a steady-state for 30 min then exhausted through a closed filter system, and trocars were retracted. Each step is illustrated in the video. CONCLUSION: This video protocol provides a better understanding of the PIPAC procedure and the safety measures essential for this method of chemotherapy administration. It should help all teams wishing to implement a PIPAC therapy program.
Authors: B Sadeghi; C Arvieux; O Glehen; A C Beaujard; M Rivoire; J Baulieux; E Fontaumard; A Brachet; J L Caillot; J L Faure; J Porcheron; J L Peix; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wiebke Solass; Reinhold Kerb; Thomas Mürdter; Urs Giger-Pabst; Dirk Strumberg; Clemens Tempfer; Jürgen Zieren; Matthias Schwab; Marc André Reymond Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Maciej Nowacki; Katarzyna Nowacka; Iwona Głowacka; Barbara Zegarska; Wojciech Zegarski Journal: Postepy Dermatol Alergol Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 1.837