Literature DB >> 28900665

[Questionnaire for the utilization of the Emergency Department : Implications for the patient survey].

J Frick1, M Möckel2, M Schmiedhofer2, J Searle2, B Erdmann3, M Erhart4, A Slagman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For several years, Emergency Departments (ED) in Germany have observed increasing patient numbers, resulting in ED crowding. This leads to the question of whether patients with nonurgent conditions could also receive adequate treatment in primary care. Our objective was to develop a quantitative questionnaire to investigate in a larger patient group the reasons for this and to describe the implications for a patient survey in the ED.
METHODS: The development of the questionnaire was based on a literature search and the results of the qualitative EPICS-2 study. Two pretest surveys were conducted in three EDs at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with outpatient treatment and the categories blue (nonurgent), green (standard), or yellow (urgent) according to the Manchester Triage System (MTS).
RESULTS: In total, 189 patients were recruited in two surveys (pretest 1: n = 89, pretest 2 n = 100). The final questionnaire includes 24 items, which were evaluated and adapted during both pretests. The items evaluate basic clinical characteristics, reasons for choosing the ED, prior contacts in primary care, utilization of primary care after-hours services as well as sociodemographic characteristics. Data from the hospital information system were used to link the survey data with clinical characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire is based on reasons for ED utilization. We recommend the written, self-applied questionnaire for patient surveys with plausibility checks conducted by staff. It is necessary to consider the heterogenic study surroundings in the ED, which requires a lot of flexibility during data collection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency Department; Health care research; Nonurgent conditions; Questionnaire; Utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900665     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-017-0345-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  12 in total

1.  [Triage in emergency departments. Comparative evaluation of 4 international triage systems].

Authors:  J Krey
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  [A basic set of indicators for mapping migrant status. Recommendations for epidemiological practice].

Authors:  L Schenk; A-M Bau; T Borde; J Butler; T Lampert; H Neuhauser; O Razum; C Weilandt
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Use of an emergency department by nonurgent patients.

Authors:  William E Northington; Jane H Brice; Bin Zou
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  [Position paper for a reform of medical emergency care in German emergency departments].

Authors:  R Riessen; A Gries; A Seekamp; C Dodt; B Kumle; H-J Busch
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 5.  [Presence and future of emergency medicine in Germany].

Authors:  Michael Christ; Christoph Dodt; Götz Geldner; Marcus Hortmann; Uwe Stadelmeyer; Hinnerk Wulf
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 0.698

6.  Emergency department use: a reflection of poor primary care access?

Authors:  Daniel Weisz; Michael K Gusmano; Grace Wong; John Trombley
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Patient motives behind low-acuity visits to the emergency department in Germany: a qualitative study comparing urban and rural sites.

Authors:  Martina Schmiedhofer; Martin Möckel; Anna Slagman; Johann Frick; Stephan Ruhla; Julia Searle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  [Reasons for Emergency Department Visits: Results of a Patient Survey].

Authors:  R Somasundaram; A Geissler; B A Leidel; C E Wrede
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2016-09-09

Review 9.  Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review.

Authors:  Lori Uscher-Pines; Jesse Pines; Arthur Kellermann; Emily Gillen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use.

Authors:  Maria L V Carret; Anaclaudia G Fassa; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Impact of medical TV series on surgical hospital patient's perception of reality].

Authors:  Kai Witzel; Michael Weitzendorfer; Philip Schredl; Horst J Koch; Cornelia Kaminski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Epidemiology of hand injuries that presented to a tertiary care facility in Germany: a study including 435 patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Moellhoff; Veronika Throner; Konstantin Frank; Ashley Benne; Michaela Coenen; Riccardo E Giunta; Elisabeth M Haas-Lützenberger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  [Empirical health services research in emergency and acute medicine : Preliminary results of concomitant monitoring of patient recruitment and sample quality].

Authors:  V Krobisch; J Deutschbein; M Möckel; M Schmiedhofer; A Schneider; T Inhoff; T Keil; C Heintze; M Rose; U Müller-Werdan; L Schenk
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  Length of stay as quality indicator in emergency departments: analysis of determinants in the German Emergency Department Data Registry (AKTIN registry).

Authors:  Ronny Otto; Sabine Blaschke; Wiebke Schirrmeister; Susanne Drynda; Felix Walcher; Felix Greiner
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.472

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.