| Literature DB >> 28900462 |
Li Shi1,2, Jiliang Fang3, Jiping Zhao1, Guiyong Liu3, Qing Zhao3, Jinling Zhang2, Jinzhao Zhang3, Bing Zhu2, Fanrong Liang4, Peijing Rong2.
Abstract
We aimed to compare the differences of the effects on chronic myocardial ischemia (MI) of acupuncture at PC6 and ST36. The chronic MI model of minipigs was created by implanting an Ameroid constrictor on the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and then two weeks' acupuncture was stimulated at PC6 or ST36, respectively. The results showed that both acupoints' stimulation decreased the serous cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and ischemia modified albumin (IMA) significantly and improved the ischemic ECG changes. The amplitude of pathological Q wave in the PC6 group decreased more significantly than that of the ST36 group. The cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) results showed that the decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not improved obviously in both groups. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) enlarged progressively even after acupuncture. The left ventricular wall mass (LVWM) in the ST36 group increased more obviously than that of the PC6 group, which paralleled the decreasing angiotensin II (Ang II) concentration in the plasma. These results suggested that acupuncture at PC6 or ST36 was effective for protecting the myocardium from chronic ischemic injury, and the effect of PC6 seemed to be better.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28900462 PMCID: PMC5576407 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7358059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The experimental procedure.
Figure 2Examples of lead II and leads V1–V3 ECG of the PC6 and ST36 groups minipigs before (baseline) and after the operation and after needle-embedding (NE) and electroacupuncture (EA). (a)-(b) Examples of lead II ECG of the PC6 and ST36 groups before (baseline) and after operation, after NE, and after EA. It showed that the ST segment declined and T wave became bidirectional after operation. After acupuncture, ST segment came back to basic line, T wave became upward, and the QT interval prolonged significantly after acupuncture at PC6 and ST36. (c)-(d) Examples of leads V1–V3 ECG of the PC6 and ST36 groups before (baseline) and after operation and after EA. It showed that the pathologic Q wave appeared at lead V1–V3 at the 4th week after the operation, and the pathologic Q wave disappeared at leads V2 and V3 after acupuncture at PC6 and ST36.
Figure 3The variation tendency of the ST segment amplitude of lead II. The ECG was taken at the normal condition, at the 4th week after operation, and at the 6th week after operation (before and after EA). The declined ST segment amplitude decreased after acupuncture both in the PC6 group (n = 6) and in the ST36 group (n = 5). But there were no significant statistical differences. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon signed-ranks and Mann-Whitney.
The percentage of normal and abnormal T wave of lead II after the operation and acupuncture.
| After operation | After acupuncture | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (%) | Abnormal (%) | Normal (%) | Abnormal (%) | |
| PC6 group | 16.70 | 83.30 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
| ST36 group | 20.00 | 80.00 | 40.00 | 60.00 |
It is indicated that a portion of inversed and bidirectional T wave induced by myocardial ischemia come back upward after acupuncture. But there was no statistical significance. Data are represented by rate and were analyzed by four tables' chi-square test.
The incidence of pathological Q wave in leads V1, V2, and V3.
| PC6 group ( | ST36 group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After operation | After acupuncture | After | After acupuncture | |
| Lead | 42.90 | 66.70 | 60.00 | 100.00 |
| Lead | 42.90 | 33.30 | 20.00 | 0.00 |
| Lead | 14.30 | 0.00 | 20.00 | 0.00 |
It was shown that the incidence of pathological Q wave decreased at leads V2 and V3. But there was no statistical difference. Data are represented by rate and were analyzed by R × C Fisher exact method. N = 5 in both PC6 group and ST36 group. One minipig in the PC6 group did not record complete ECG.
Figure 4The changed amplitude of pathological Q wave. The figure shows the changes in pathological Q wave amplitude of lead V1, which is the differences of pathological Q wave amplitude after needle-embedding (NE) or electroacupuncture (EA) and after the operation. The amplitude of pathological Q wave decreased significantly after NE at PC6 acupoint (○P = 0.029, compared with 0 mV), and there was statistical difference between the PC6 and ST36 group (△P = 0.034, compared with that of the ST36 group). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by t-test. N = 5 in both PC6 group and ST36 group. One minipig in the PC6 group did not record complete ECG.
Figure 5Lead II QT interval of the PC6 group and ST36 group. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by t-test. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, compared with that after operation in the same group. ■P < 0.05 and ■■P < 0.01, compared with the baseline of the PC6 group. The QT interval of the PC6 group prolonged significantly compared with that after operation (P = 0.021, after NE; and P = 0.003, after EA). The QT interval of the ST36 group prolonged significantly after EA compared with that after operation (P = 0.024). The QT interval of the PC6 group prolonged significantly compared with the normal condition (P = 0.021, after NE; and P = 0.004, after EA).
Serous concentrations of CK-MB, cTnT, IMA, and Ang II of the minipigs in the PC6 and ST36 group tested at the normal condition, at the 4th week after the operation and after acupuncture.
| Baseline | After operation | After acupuncture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC6 group | ST36 group | PC6 group | ST36 group | PC6 group | ST36 group | |
| CK-MB (U/L) | 8.39 ± 0.85 | 9.08 ± 2.92 | 9.61 ± 1.03 | 11.16 ± 1.79 | 7.76 ± 0.90 | 6.87 ± 0.50 |
| cTnT (pg/ml) | 55.43 ± 6.59 | 59.41 ± 23.09 | 69.14 ± 7.96 | 86.12 ± 15.22 | 40.07 ± 3.87 | 32.62 ± 0.99 |
| IMA (U/mL) | 50.46 ± 7.48 | 74.11 ± 9.77△ | 76.30 ± 4.11■ | 85.00 ± 7.43 | 59.07 ± 3.01 | 44.89 ± 1.60 |
| Ang II (pg/ml) | 90.94 ± 13.41 | 134.99 ± 46.39 | 131.51 ± 20.35 | 107.82 ± 22.15 | 119.72 ± 27.62 | 142.13 ± 16.71 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (the PC6 group, n = 6; the ST36 group, n = 5). P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, compared with that after operation of the same group. ■P < 0.05, compared with its baseline of the same group. The data of IMA of the PC6 group at different time were analyzed by t-test, and the others were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-ranks. △P < 0.05, compared with the baseline of the PC6 group. Datum comparisons between the two groups used rank sum test followed by Mann-Whitney U test.
The cardiac functional parameters of the PC6 group and ST36 group minipigs.
| Baseline | After operation | After acupuncture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC6 group | ST36 group | PC6 group | ST36 group | PC6 group | ST36 group | |
| LVEF (%) | 71.00 ± 6.47 | 68.60 ± 3.77 | 54.75 ± 4.50 | 47.00 ± 4.91■ | 49.00 ± 1.96 | 51.80 ± 1.62■ |
| LVEDV (ml) | 43.58 ± 5.26 | 37.12 ± 4.50 | 60.22 ± 7.03 | 56.22 ± 11.74 | 72.92 ± 6.65 | 68.92 ± 5.36■■ |
| LVESV (ml) | 13.26 ± 3.26 | 10.64 ± 1.17 | 28.79 ± 5.55 | 28.82 ± 5.96 | 37.24 ± 2.63■ | 33.16 ± 3.08■ |
| Stroke volume (ml) | 29.56 ± 4.31 | 26.48 ± 3.63 | 33.94 ± 1.02 | 26.79 ± 6.26 | 38.06 ± 4.50 | 35.76 ± 2.72 |
| Cardiac output (l/min) | 1.92 ± 0.42 | 1.63 ± 0.19 | 2.17 ± 0.11 | 2.39 ± 0.10 | 2.13 ± 0.16 | 1.76 ± 0.06 |
| LVWM (mean) (g) | 34.93 ± 6.81 | 33.31 ± 4.98 | 35.65 ± 9.31 | 37.97 ± 5.21 | 37.16 ± 2.90 | 45.88 ± 1.74△ |
The cardiac functions were assessed by cMRI at the normal condition, at the 4th week after the operation, and after acupuncture. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (the PC6 group, n = 4, two in the PC6 group were failed to collect the cMRI data completely; the ST36 group, n = 5). ■P < 0.05 and ■■P < 0.01, compared with their separate baselines of the same group, respectively (P = 0.008, the LVEDV of the ST36 group; P = 0.024, the LVESV of the PC6 group; P = 0.043, the LVESV of the ST36 group; P = 0.017, the LVEF of ST36 group after acupuncture). Data of LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV of PC6 group were analyzed by t-test, and LVESV of ST36 group was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-ranks. △P < 0.05, compared with that of the PC6 group after acupuncture. The left ventricular wall mass of the ST36 group was significantly greater than that of the PC6 group (P = 0.030). Data were analyzed by t-test.