Literature DB >> 28899923

A retrospective analysis of 34 potentially missed cases of female genital mutilation in the emergency department.

Richard John Fawcett1,2, George Kernohan2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discover if healthcare professionals working within an ED are able to make a diagnosis of female genital mutilation (FGM) in those patients who have previously undergone the procedure and report it as per UK law.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients' notes who were assigned an FGM code during the period of May 2015 to August 2016.
SETTING: Single-centre, large UK major trauma centre offering a tertiary FGM clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Any woman coded during the study period as having undergone FGM. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Number of FGM cases identified by the ED. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Mean age, presenting complaint, discharge diagnosis, genitourinary exam and defibulation status.
RESULTS: 34 patients were identified as having undergone FGM, 19 had previously attended ED and none had their FGM identified during their ED attendance. The age range of those identified was 23 to 40 years. None had undergone defibulation.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the identification of FGM victims by an ED is very poor, and more work needs to be done to increase awareness of the subject by front-line staff. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Uro-genital; emergency department management; guidelines; law; violence, non-accidental

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28899923     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  2 in total

1.  The eye cannot see what the mind does not know: female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Hanni Stoklosa; Nawal M Nour
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Conversations about FGM in primary care: a realist review on how, why and under what circumstances FGM is discussed in general practice consultations.

Authors:  Sharon Dixon; Claire Duddy; Gabrielle Harrison; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Sue Ziebland; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.