Literature DB >> 28898917

Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.

Marcin Polkowski1,2, Christian Jenssen3, Philip Kaye4, Silvia Carrara5, Pierre Deprez6, Angels Gines7, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach7, Pierre Eisendrath8, Guruprasad P Aithal4, Paolo Arcidiacono9, Marc Barthet10, Pedro Bastos11, Adele Fornelli12, Bertrand Napoleon13, Julio Iglesias-Garcia14, Andrada Seicean15, Alberto Larghi16, Cesare Hassan16, Jeanin E van Hooft17, Jean-Marc Dumonceau18.   

Abstract

For routine EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and lymph nodes (LNs) ESGE recommends 25G or 22G needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation); fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles are equally recommended (high quality evidence, strong recommendation).When the primary aim of sampling is to obtain a core tissue specimen, ESGE suggests using 19G FNA or FNB needles or 22G FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE recommends using 10-mL syringe suction for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with 25G or 22G FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and other types of needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests neutralizing residual negative pressure in the needle before withdrawing the needle from the target lesion (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend for or against using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses and LNs with FNA needles (high quality evidence, strong recommendation) and suggests using the needle stylet for EUS-guided sampling with FNB needles (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE suggests fanning the needle throughout the lesion when sampling solid masses and LNs (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE equally recommends EUS-guided sampling with or without on-site cytologic evaluation (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). When on-site cytologic evaluation is unavailable, ESGE suggests performance of three to four needle passes with an FNA needle or two to three passes with an FNB needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).For diagnostic sampling of pancreatic cystic lesions without a solid component, ESGE suggests emptying the cyst with a single pass of a 22G or 19G needle (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). For pancreatic cystic lesions with a solid component, ESGE suggests sampling of the solid component using the same technique as in the case of other solid lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE does not recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for EUS-guided sampling of solid masses or LNs (low quality evidence, strong recommendation), and suggests antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones or beta-lactam antibiotics for EUS-guided sampling of cystic lesions (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests that evaluation of tissue obtained by EUS-guided sampling should include histologic preparations (e. g., cell blocks and/or formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue fragments) and should not be limited to smear cytology (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28898917     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  64 in total

1.  Concise Commentary: Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Endoscopic Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Bursting the Bubble?

Authors:  Rintaro Hashimoto; John G Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Antibiotics Do Not Decrease the Rate of Infection After Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Vincenzo Rosario Buccino; Antonio Turco; Matteo Antonino; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Rosario Vincenzo Buccino; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

4.  EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.

Authors:  Diogo T H de Moura; Thomas R McCarty; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Igor B Ribeiro; Victor K Flumignan; Fedaa Najdawai; Marvin Ryou; Linda S Lee; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  The Impact of Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Susana Marques; Miguel Bispo; Ricardo Rio-Tinto; Paulo Fidalgo; Jacques Devière
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-23

6.  Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Elia Armellini; Erminia Manfrin; Elena Trisolini; Silvano Andorno; Marco Ballarè; Laura Bernardoni; Renzo Luciano Boldorini; Armando Gabbrielli; Luca Frulloni; Alberto Larghi; Pietro Occhipinti; Aldo Scarpa; Stefano Francesco Crinò
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 7.  [Diagnostics and clinical management of premalignant diseases of the pancreas].

Authors:  S M Buchholz; C Ammer-Herrmenau; V Ellenrieder; A Neesse
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Performance of EUS-FNB in solid pancreatic masses: a lesson from 463 consecutive procedures and a practical nomogram.

Authors:  Nico Pagano; Claudio Ricci; Carlo Ingaldi; Sinan Sadalla; Andrea Fabbri; Laura Alberici; Giovanna Impellizeri; Socrate Pallio; Rocco Maurizio Zagari; Antonio De Leo; Matteo Cescon; Riccardo Casadei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-29

9.  Multicenter, randomized comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 19-gauge stainless steel and nitinol-based needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Sonja Epp; Lothar Veits; Ulrich Rosien; Julian Siegel; Oliver Möschler; Wolfram Bohle; Alexander Meining
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Furqan Bhullar; Omar Alaber; Ayesha Kamal; Puanani Hopson; Kavin Kanthasamy; Sarah Coughlin; Livia Archibugi; Nikhil Thiruvengadam; Christopher Moreau; David Jin; Pedram Paragomi; Francisco Valverde-López; Sajan Nagpal; Cemal Yazici; Georgios Papchristou; Peter J Lee; Venkata Akshintala
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.