Literature DB >> 28898704

Interpretation of indeterminate HIV-1 PCR results are influenced by changing vertical transmission prevention regimens.

Jean Maritz1, Jayshree Narvin Maharaj2, Mark Frederic Cotton3, Wolfgang Preiser4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suppression of HIV by antiretroviral drugs may be one of the reasons that indeterminate HIV-1 PCR results are obtained from testing HIV-exposed infants. This complicates the early identification of infected infants, potentially delaying initiating treatment early. There is uncertainty as to how different vertical HIV transmission prevention regimens (VTP) affect the rate and predictive value of indeterminate PCR results.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate rates of indeterminate PCR results, outcomes of subsequent samples and the predictive value of an indeterminate PCR for a later positive result in the setting of intensifying VTP in the Western Cape province of South Africa. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective laboratory data analysis. Diagnostic PCR data of a public health laboratory from June 2009 to October 2014 was analysed and categorised by South African VTP regimens. First indeterminate HIV-1 PCRs in patients younger than 12 months were linked with follow-up HIV-1 PCRs and/or serological tests. Linked results sets were analysed by PCR amplification characteristics and subsequent patient outcome.
RESULTS: Over intensified VTP regimens, the rate of indeterminate and positive PCRs decreased significantly (5.6-3.2% and 2.4-0.4%, respectively; both p<0.001). Most notably, significantly more patients with indeterminate results had positive PCRs on subsequent samples during WHO Option B+ use compared to older regimens (64.1% vs. 14.7%, p<0.001) at a median 28days later.
CONCLUSIONS: Indeterminate HIV PCRs, although decreasing in frequency with Option B+, should be regarded with a high index of suspicion for being representative of true HIV-1 infections. Additional virological testing is required to arrive at a definitive diagnosis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False positive; Indeterminate result; Infant diagnosis; Misdiagnosis; PCR; Prophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28898704     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  4 in total

1.  Clinical Consequences of Using an Indeterminate Range for Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV: A Decision Model.

Authors:  Phillip Salvatore; Karl Johnson; Lara Vojnov; Meg Doherty; David Dowdy
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Point-of-care HIV testing best practice for early infant diagnosis: an implementation study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spooner; Kerusha Govender; Tarylee Reddy; Gita Ramjee; Noxolo Mbadi; Swaran Singh; Anna Coutsoudis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Neonatal and infant diagnostic HIV-PCR uptake and associations during three sequential policy periods in Cape Town, South Africa: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Emma Kalk; Max Kroon; Andrew Boulle; Meg Osler; Jonathan Euvrard; Kathryn Stinson; Venessa Timmerman; Mary-Ann Davies
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.396

4.  Accuracy and Operational Characteristics of Xpert Human Immunodeficiency Virus Point-of-Care Testing at Birth and Until Week 6 in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-exposed Neonates in Tanzania.

Authors:  Issa Sabi; Hellen Mahiga; Jimson Mgaya; Otto Geisenberger; Sabine Kastner; Willyhelmina Olomi; Elmar Saathoff; Lilian Njovu; Cornelia Lueer; John France; Leonard Maboko; Nyanda Elias Ntinginya; Michael Hoelscher; Arne Kroidl
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 9.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.