OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of changing the Australian Goods and Services Tax (GST) on household food stress, which occurs when >25% of disposable income needs to be spent on food. METHODS: Weekly healthy meal plan costs for average-income (AI), low-income (LI) and welfare-dependent (WDI) families were calculated using the 2013 Western Australian (WA) Food Access and Costs Survey. Four GST scenarios were compared: 1) status quo; 2) increasing GST to 15%; 3) expanding base to include exempt foods at 10% GST; and 4) expanding base to include exempt foods and increasing the tax to 15%. RESULTS: Single-parent families risk food stress regardless of their income or the GST scenario (requiring 24-42% of disposable income). The probability of food stress in Scenario 1 is 100% for WDI two-parent families and 36% for LI earners. In Scenarios 3 and 4, food stress probability is 60-72% for two-parent LI families and AI single-parent families, increasing to 88-94% if residing in very remote areas. CONCLUSION: There is food stress risk among single-parent, LI and WDI families, particularly those residing in very remote areas. Implications for public health: Expanding GST places an additional burden on people who are already vulnerable to poor nutrition and chronic disease due to their socioeconomic circumstances.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of changing the Australian Goods and Services Tax (GST) on household food stress, which occurs when >25% of disposable income needs to be spent on food. METHODS: Weekly healthy meal plan costs for average-income (AI), low-income (LI) and welfare-dependent (WDI) families were calculated using the 2013 Western Australian (WA) Food Access and Costs Survey. Four GST scenarios were compared: 1) status quo; 2) increasing GST to 15%; 3) expanding base to include exempt foods at 10% GST; and 4) expanding base to include exempt foods and increasing the tax to 15%. RESULTS: Single-parent families risk food stress regardless of their income or the GST scenario (requiring 24-42% of disposable income). The probability of food stress in Scenario 1 is 100% for WDI two-parent families and 36% for LI earners. In Scenarios 3 and 4, food stress probability is 60-72% for two-parent LI families and AI single-parent families, increasing to 88-94% if residing in very remote areas. CONCLUSION: There is food stress risk among single-parent, LI and WDI families, particularly those residing in very remote areas. Implications for public health: Expanding GST places an additional burden on people who are already vulnerable to poor nutrition and chronic disease due to their socioeconomic circumstances.
Authors: Alison Daly; Christina M Pollard; Deborah A Kerr; Colin W Binns; Martin Caraher; Michael Phillips Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christina Mary Pollard; Timothy John Landrigan; Jennie Margaret Gray; Lockie McDonald; Helen Creed; Sue Booth Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sally Mackay; Tina Buch; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Rawinia Goodwin; Erina Korohina; Mafi Funaki-Tahifote; Amanda Lee; Boyd Swinburn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Timothy J Landrigan; Deborah A Kerr; Satvinder S Dhaliwal; Christina M Pollard Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christina M Pollard; Sue Booth; Jonine Jancey; Bruce Mackintosh; Claire E Pulker; Janine L Wright; Andrea Begley; Sabrah Imtiaz; Claire Silic; S Aqif Mukhtar; Martin Caraher; Joel Berg; Deborah A Kerr Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.390