Literature DB >> 2889599

The effects of beta-adrenergic blocking agents on atherosclerosis and its complications.

J R Kaplan1, S B Manuck, M R Adams, T B Clarkson.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic and experimental data are reviewed to determine whether treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents ('beta blockers') is likely to be antiatherogenic. Both indirect and direct evidence are considered. Indirect evidence is derived from studies of the effects of beta blockers on the risk factors for atherosclerosis, or on the disease sequelae of atherosclerosis. Direct evidence refers to studies in which atherosclerosis is an endpoint. Regarding indirect evidence, the data generally are consistent with a retarding or neutral effect of beta blockers on atherosclerosis. For example stroke incidence is reduced when hypertension is treated with beta blockers. About half of these same studies also show a reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction, a complication that may be more closely related to atherosclerosis extent and severity than is stroke, which can have a nonatherosclerosis origin. The most important potential negative effect of beta blockers occurs with respect to serum lipid concentrations. However, there is no evidence that atherosclerosis is worsened as a result of pharmacologically induced alterations of serum lipids. The direct evidence more clearly indicates a retarding effect of beta blockers on atherosclerosis, with 11 of 13 studies having outcomes in this direction. However, interpretation of these studies is complicated by the fact that all of the data are derived from animal models, some of which are not similar to human beings in the development of atherosclerosis. Also, the studies are diverse, not only in the research designs and species utilized, but also in the type of beta blocker employed, the degree of beta blockade achieved, and the anatomic location of lesions. In summary, the data suggest that treatment with beta blockers may retard atherosclerosis. A more definitive answer requires efforts in two directions: (a) studies on atherosclerosis in selected populations of human beings, using cineangiography or autopsy material; and (b) additional, well-controlled studies in appropriate animal models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2889599     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  9 in total

1.  Cardiovascular reactivity in cardiovascular disease: "once more unto the breach".

Authors:  S B Manuck
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1994

Review 2.  Beta receptor antagonists in the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  H Persson; L Erhardt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  Do partial agonist beta-blockers have improved clinical utility?

Authors:  J D Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 4.  Cardioprotective therapeutics--drugs used in hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, thromboembolism, arrhythmias, the postmenopausal state and as anti-oxidants.

Authors:  M J Kendall; I Rajman; S R Maxwell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Metoprolol treatment for two years after coronary bypass grafting: effects on exercise capacity and signs of myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  H Sjöland; K Caidahl; L Lurje; A Hjalmarson; J Herlitz
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-09

Review 6.  Antihypertensive profile of carvedilol.

Authors:  W Meyer-Sabellek; B Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992

Review 7.  Controlled release metoprolol. Clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  M J Kendall; S R Maxwell; A Sandberg; G Westergren
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Inhibition of platelet accumulation by beta 1-adrenoceptor blockade in the thoracic aorta of rabbits subjected to experimental sympathetic activation.

Authors:  K Pettersson; H Björk
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  A risk-benefit assessment of celiprolol in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M J Kendall; I Rajman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.606

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.