Literature DB >> 28895772

Flow cytometry-based platelet function testing is predictive of symptom burden in a cohort of bleeders.

Niklas Boknäs1, Sofia Ramström2,3, Lars Faxälv4, Tomas L Lindahl2.   

Abstract

Platelet function disorders (PFDs) are common in patients with mild bleeding disorders (MBDs), yet the significance of laboratory findings suggestive of a PFD remain unclear due to the lack of evidence for a clinical correlation between the test results and the patient phenotype. Herein, we present the results from a study evaluating the potential utility of platelet function testing using whole-blood flow cytometry in a cohort of 105 patients undergoing investigation for MBD. Subjects were evaluated with a test panel comprising two different activation markers (fibrinogen binding and P-selectin exposure) and four physiologically relevant platelet agonists (ADP, PAR1-AP, PAR4-AP, and CRP-XL). Abnormal test results were identified by comparison with reference ranges constructed from 24 healthy controls or with the fifth percentile of the entire patient cohort. We found that the abnormal test results are predictive of bleeding symptom severity, and that the greatest predictive strength was achieved using a subset of the panel, comparing measurements of fibrinogen binding after activation with all four agonists with the fifth percentile of the patient cohort (p = 0.00008, hazard ratio 8.7; 95% CI 2.5-40). Our results suggest that whole-blood flow cytometry-based platelet function testing could become a feasible alternative for the investigation of MBDs. We also show that platelet function testing using whole-blood flow cytometry could provide a clinically relevant quantitative assessment of platelet-related hemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bleeding disorders; flow cytometry; platelet function defects; platelet function tests; primary hemostasis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28895772     DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1349305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Platelets        ISSN: 0953-7104            Impact factor:   3.862


  3 in total

1.  A simplified flow cytometric method for detection of inherited platelet disorders-A comparison to the gold standard light transmission aggregometry.

Authors:  Kristoffer Navred; Myriam Martin; Lina Ekdahl; Eva Zetterberg; Nadine Gretenkort Andersson; Karin Strandberg; Eva Norstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Platelet function testing at low platelet counts: When can you trust your analysis?

Authors:  Niklas Boknäs; Ankit S Macwan; Anna L Södergren; Sofia Ramström
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-03-19

3.  Standardization and reference ranges for whole blood platelet function measurements using a flow cytometric platelet activation test.

Authors:  Dana Huskens; Yaqiu Sang; Joke Konings; Lisa van der Vorm; Bas de Laat; Hilde Kelchtermans; Mark Roest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.