Literature DB >> 28895112

External Validation of the Prognostic Nomogram (COMPASS) for Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Karel Demey1, Albert Wolthuis2, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten2, Steffen Fieuws3, Vincent Vandecaveye4, Eric Van Cutsem5, André D'Hoore2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To optimize outcome, selection of patients for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is critical. Recently, Simkens et al.7 evaluated the peritoneal surface disease severity score (PSDSS) and suggested a new prognostic nomogram, the colorectal peritoneal metastases prognostic surgical score (COMPASS) based on age, peritoneal carcinomatosis index score, locoregional lymph node status, and signet ring cell histology. This COMPASS nomogram had better discriminative ability according to the Harrell c-index than PSDSS (c = 0.72 vs. 0.62). This study aimed to validate the COMPASS nomogram externally.
METHODS: Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database, and all patients who underwent surgery between May 2005 and May 2016 were included in the study. For each patient, the PSDSS and COMPASS were calculated and then divided into subgroups. The discriminative ability of both scores for overall survival were quantified using Harrell c indices.
RESULTS: A total of 153 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer. The median overall survival (OS) was 46 months, and the mean PSDSS was 7.8 ± 3.7. When the PSDSS was divided into subgroups, the c index was 0.67. The mean COMPASS was 55.5 ± 25.6. When the patients were divided into four groups according to cutpoints of Simkens et al.7 a c index of 0.72 was obtained, showing its significant superiority over the discriminative ability of the PSDSS (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: External validation of the COMPASS confirms its moderate to good discriminative ability and its superiority over the PSDSS. Nevertheless, discrimination with the COMPASS score remains suboptimal, and further research on prognostic variables is essential for optimal patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28895112     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6042-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alfonso García-Fadrique; Rafael Estevan Estevan; Luis Sabater Ortí
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Metachronous Peritoneal Metastases After Adjuvant Chemotherapy are Associated with Poor Outcome After Cytoreduction and HIPEC.

Authors:  Nina R Sluiter; Koen P Rovers; Youssra Salhi; Stijn L Vlek; Veerle M H Coupé; Henk M W Verheul; Geert Kazemier; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jurriaan B Tuynman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC.

Authors:  Wilhelm Graf; Peter H Cashin; Lana Ghanipour; Malin Enblad; Johan Botling; Alexei Terman; Helgi Birgisson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Definition and Prediction of Early Recurrence and Mortality Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Towards Predicting Oncologic Futility Preoperatively.

Authors:  Caroline J Rieser; Heather Jones; Lauren B Hall; Eliza Kang; Shannon Altpeter; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew P Holtzman; Andrew Lee; Melanie Ongchin; James F Pingpank; M Haroon A Choudry; David L Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastasis.

Authors:  Zifeng Yang; Yong Li; Xiusen Qin; Zejian Lv; Huaiming Wang; Deqing Wu; Zixu Yuan; Hui Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Prognostic factors for ovarian metastases in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Da Wang; Xiaoxu Ge; Jian Wang; Yuhuai Huang; Tianyi Ling; Tian Jin; Jinhua Yang; Fengping Wang; Weihong Wu; Lifeng Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.