Alisha Monnette1, Yichen Zhang1, Hui Shao1, Lizheng Shi2. 1. Department of Global Health Management and Policy, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. 2. Department of Global Health Management and Policy, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. lshi1@tulane.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: As medication adherence continues to be a prevalent issue in today's society, the methods used to monitor medication-taking behaviors are constantly being re-evaluated and compared in search of the 'gold standard' measure. Our review aimed to assess the current literature surrounding the correlation between self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) and electronic monitoring devices to determine if these measures produce similar results. METHODS: We performed a literature search from 2009 to 2017 using PubMed, PubMed In-Process and Non-Indexed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid MEDLINE In-Process. A keyword search using the terms 'patient compliance', 'treatment compliance', 'medication adherence', 'drug monitoring', 'drug therapy', 'electronic', 'digital', 'computer', 'monitor', 'monitoring', 'drug', 'pharmaceutical preparations', 'compliance', and 'medications' was done to capture all articles. We included articles measuring adherence using both monitoring devices and SRQs. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles were included in this review. The average difference in measured adherence rates between the two measures was 9.2% (range -66.3 to 61.5). A majority (62.7%) of articles reported moderate (n = 12; 27.9%), high (n = 5, 11.6%), or significant (n = 10, 23.3%) correlations between SRQs and monitoring devices. CONCLUSION: Results from our review are consistent with previous studies, as we found that many of our studies produced moderate to high correlation between both SRQs and monitoring devices [Farmer, Clin Ther 21(6):1074-90 (1999), IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Avoidable costs in US health care (2012), Patel et al., Respirology 18(3):546-52 (2013), Siracusa et al., J Cyst Fibros 14(5):621-6 (2015), Smith et al., Int J Cardiol 145(1):122-3 (2010)]. Our findings demonstrate that self-reported adherence produces comparable results to electronic monitoring devices. As there is not yet a 'gold standard' measure for monitoring patient adherence, SRQs and Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) operating together continue to emerge as the preferred effective method for measuring medication adherence.
INTRODUCTION: As medication adherence continues to be a prevalent issue in today's society, the methods used to monitor medication-taking behaviors are constantly being re-evaluated and compared in search of the 'gold standard' measure. Our review aimed to assess the current literature surrounding the correlation between self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) and electronic monitoring devices to determine if these measures produce similar results. METHODS: We performed a literature search from 2009 to 2017 using PubMed, PubMed In-Process and Non-Indexed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid MEDLINE In-Process. A keyword search using the terms 'patient compliance', 'treatment compliance', 'medication adherence', 'drug monitoring', 'drug therapy', 'electronic', 'digital', 'computer', 'monitor', 'monitoring', 'drug', 'pharmaceutical preparations', 'compliance', and 'medications' was done to capture all articles. We included articles measuring adherence using both monitoring devices and SRQs. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles were included in this review. The average difference in measured adherence rates between the two measures was 9.2% (range -66.3 to 61.5). A majority (62.7%) of articles reported moderate (n = 12; 27.9%), high (n = 5, 11.6%), or significant (n = 10, 23.3%) correlations between SRQs and monitoring devices. CONCLUSION: Results from our review are consistent with previous studies, as we found that many of our studies produced moderate to high correlation between both SRQs and monitoring devices [Farmer, Clin Ther 21(6):1074-90 (1999), IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Avoidable costs in US health care (2012), Patel et al., Respirology 18(3):546-52 (2013), Siracusa et al., J Cyst Fibros 14(5):621-6 (2015), Smith et al., Int J Cardiol 145(1):122-3 (2010)]. Our findings demonstrate that self-reported adherence produces comparable results to electronic monitoring devices. As there is not yet a 'gold standard' measure for monitoring patient adherence, SRQs and Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) operating together continue to emerge as the preferred effective method for measuring medication adherence.
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Bradi B Granger; Phil Mendys; Ralph Brindis; Rebecca Burkholder; Susan M Czajkowski; Jodi G Daniel; Inger Ekman; Michael Ho; Mimi Johnson; Stephen E Kimmel; Larry Z Liu; John Musaus; William H Shrank; Elizabeth Whalley Buono; Karen Weiss; Christopher B Granger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Moupali Das; Deirdre Santos; Tim Matheson; Glenn-Milo Santos; Priscilla Chu; Eric Vittinghoff; Steve Shoptaw; Grant N Colfax Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ellen De Cuyper; Veronique De Gucht; Stan Maes; Yoleen Van Camp; Luc S De Clerck Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Robyn Sayner; Delesha M Carpenter; Susan J Blalock; Alan L Robin; Kelly W Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Annette L Giangiacomo; Gail Tudor; Betsy Sleath Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Sarah Clifford; Magaly Perez-Nieves; Anne M Skalicky; Matthew Reaney; Karin S Coyne Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Martha Sajatovic; Jennifer B Levin; Johnny Sams; Kristin A Cassidy; Kouri Akagi; Michelle E Aebi; Luis F Ramirez; Steven A Safren; Curtis Tatsuoka Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: M Bauer; T Glenn; M Alda; R Bauer; P Grof; W Marsh; S Monteith; R Munoz; N Rasgon; K Sagduyu; P C Whybrow Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2019-09-04
Authors: Stephanie R Reading; Mary Helen Black; Daniel E Singer; Alan S Go; Margaret C Fang; Natalia Udaltsova; Teresa N Harrison; Rong X Wei; In-Lu Amy Liu; Kristi Reynolds Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Mehdi Abouzari; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Janice T Chua; Donald Tan; Brooke Sarna; Tina Saber; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Maximilian Pilhatsch; Tasha Glenn; Natalie Rasgon; Martin Alda; Kemal Sagduyu; Paul Grof; Rodrigo Munoz; Wendy Marsh; Scott Monteith; Emanuel Severus; Rita Bauer; Philipp Ritter; Peter C Whybrow; Michael Bauer Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-05-01