| Literature DB >> 28894706 |
Yin-Qing Hu1, Yi-Fan Wu1, Li-Li Hou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a serious threat to human health and life worldwide. Anxiety is common amongst palliative care patients with lung cancer and adversely affects quality of life. Acupuncture is an effective and safe treatment method used for the treatment of depressive mood status. We aimed to assess the influence of electrical acupuncture stimulation on self-reported anxiety in palliative care among patients with lung cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Electrical acupuncture stimulation; Lung cancer; Palliative care; Patients; Self-reported anxiety
Year: 2017 PMID: 28894706 PMCID: PMC5575384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Fig.1:Flow diagram of this study
Fig. 2:Location of acupuncture: A: Zusanli (ST36); B: Sanyinjiao (SP36); C: Hegu (LI4). The red solid points in A, B, and C represent Zusanli, Sanyinjiao, and Hegu (LI4), respectively
Demographic characteristics (N=188) and comparison in 3 groups
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 2.42 | 0.29 | |||
| Male | 51(82.3%) | 60(80%) | 36(70.6%) | ||
| Female | 11(17.7%) | 15(20%) | 15(29.4%) | ||
| Financial | 1.78 | 0.41 | |||
| status | |||||
| Pension | 45(72.6%) | 50(66.7%) | 31(60.8%) | ||
| Non-pension | 17(27.4%) | 25(33.3%) | 20(39.2%) | ||
| Family History | 4.91 | 0.09 | |||
| Yes | 1(1.6%) | 1(1.3%) | 4(7.8%) | ||
| No | 61(98.4%) | 74(98.7%) | 47(92.2%) | ||
| Age | 58.81±10.50 | 59.45±8.20 | 59.98±8.51 | 0.09 | 0.91 |
| BMI | 24.05±2.76 | 22.97±4.52 | 23.59±2.72 | 1.59 | 0.21 |
| Body temperature | 36.81±0.29 | 36.73±0.32 | 36.79±0.31 | 1.43 | 0.24 |
| Heart rate | 81.52±4.52 | 82.68±5.76 | 83.57±7.32 | 1.75 | 0.18 |
| Respiratory rate | 20.98±11.54 | 19.61±1.15 | 21.37±7.21 | 0.96 | 0.39 |
| Systolic | 125.65±15.33 | 125.41±15.25 | 121.00±15.25 | 1.63 | 0.20 |
| Pressure | |||||
| Diastolic | 78.48±7.47 | 78.89±9.71 | 75.33±8.56 | 2.82 | 0.06 |
| Pressure | |||||
| KPS | 92.54±6.76 | 91.76±7.58 | 88.46±6.89 | 1.41 | 0.25 |
Comparison of SAS scores in 3 groups (n=188)
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group(n=62) | 34.28±8.39 | 41.84±13.01 | 35.63±9.92 |
| MS Group (n=75) | 35.37±14.74 | 37.85±15.92 | 35.53±14.29 |
| TEAS Group (n=51) | 31.17±7.55 | 34.58±13.98 | 27.86±6.73 |
| F test | 2.02 | 3.61 | 7.01 |
|
| 0.11 | 0.06 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 3:Qol scores of the three different groups. Qol scores of the three different groups at 1 day before, 8th day, and 28th day, respectively
Fig. 4:Comfort scores of the three different groups. Comfort scores of the three different groups at 1 day before, 8th day, and 28th day, respectively