Literature DB >> 28894580

Safety of total gastrectomy without nasogastric and nutritional intubation.

Hong-Wei Zhang1, Li Sun1, Xue-Wen Yang1, Fan Feng1, Guo-Cai Li1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of gastrectomy without nasogastric and nutritional intubations. Between January 2010 and August 2015, 74 patients with gastric cancer received total gastric resection and esophagogastric anastomosis without nasogastric and nutritional intubations at the First Department of Digestive Surgery of the XiJing Hospital of Digestive Diseases (Xi'an, China), of whom 42 were also received earlier oral feeding within 48 h. The data were retrospectively analyzed. An additional 301 cases who underwent traditional postoperative intubation were used for comparison. In patients without intubation compared with those managed traditionally with intubation, the mean operative time was decreased (190.97±38.18 vs. 216.12±59.52 min, respectively; P=0.026). In addition, the postoperative activity was resumed earlier (1.16±0.47 vs. 1.36±0.84 days, respectively; P=0.009), oral food intake was started earlier (4.28±1.79 vs. 5.71±2.66 days, respectively; P=0.009), the incidence of fever was lower (12.16 vs. 29.23%, respectively; P=0.003), and the incidence of total complications was not statistically significantly different between the two groups (9.41 vs. 6.31%, respectively; P=0.317). There were no significant differences regarding complications of the anastomotic port (1.37 vs. 1.69%, respectively; P=0.849). Compared with traditional postoperative management, earlier oral feeding did not increase the incidence of complications (7.21 vs. 4.76%, respectively; P=0.557). Our results suggest that total gastric resection without nasogastric and nutritional intubation is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing total gastrectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; fast-track surgery; nasogastric tube; nutritional tube

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894580      PMCID: PMC5582511          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  35 in total

1.  An enhanced-recovery protocol improves outcome after colorectal resection already during the first year: a single-center experience in 168 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jonas Nygren; Mattias Soop; Anders Thorell; Jonatan Hausel; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico- duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  G Balzano; A Zerbi; M Braga; S Rocchetti; A A Beneduce; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Soumil Vyas; Majid Hashemi; Mark Winslet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuan-Jun Li; Ting-Ting Huo; Juan Xing; Jia-Ze An; Zhe-Yi Han; Xiao-Nan Liu; Qing-Chuan Zhao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Smoking, hypertension, and colonic anastomotic healing; a combined clinical and histopathological study.

Authors:  A Fawcett; M Shembekar; J S Church; R Vashisht; R G Springall; D M Nott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations.

Authors:  R Nelson; B Tse; S Edwards
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Haemoglobin A1c as a predictor of postoperative hyperglycaemia and complications after major colorectal surgery.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; A Thorell; M Soop; O Ljungqvist; J Nygren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Postoperative decrease in suture holding capacity in laparotomy wounds and anastomoses.

Authors:  H Högström; U Haglund
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1985

10.  A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients.

Authors:  Hayden White; Kellie Sosnowski; Khoa Tran; Annelli Reeves; Mark Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.