| Literature DB >> 28894271 |
Liang Jie Wong1,2, Kyung-Han Hong3, Sergio Carbajo4, Arya Fallahi5, Philippe Piot6,7, Marin Soljačić8, John D Joannopoulos8, Franz X Kärtner3,9,5, Ido Kaminer8,10.
Abstract
Linear-field particle acceleration in free space (which is distinct from geometries like the linac that requires components in the vicinity of the particle) has been studied for over 20 years, and its ability to eventually produce high-quality, high energy multi-particle bunches has remained a subject of great interest. Arguments can certainly be made that linear-field particle acceleration in free space is very doubtful given that first-order electron-photon interactions are forbidden in free space. Nevertheless, we chose to develop an accurate and truly predictive theoretical formalism to explore this remote possibility when intense, few-cycle electromagnetic pulses are used in a computational experiment. The formalism includes exact treatment of Maxwell's equations and exact treatment of the interaction among the multiple individual particles at near and far field. Several surprising results emerge. We find that electrons interacting with intense laser pulses in free space are capable of gaining substantial amounts of energy that scale linearly with the field amplitude. For example, 30 keV electrons (2.5% energy spread) are accelerated to 61 MeV (0.5% spread) and to 205 MeV (0.25% spread) using 250 mJ and 2.5 J lasers respectively. These findings carry important implications for our understanding of ultrafast electron-photon interactions in strong fields.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28894271 PMCID: PMC5593863 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11547-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Linear-field electron acceleration in unbounded free space by an ultrafast radially-polarized laser pulse, a process illustrated schematically in (a). As an example, (b) shows the net acceleration to a final energy of 7.7 MeV of a 30 keV electron pulse with charge −0.2 fC, by a 25 mJ, 3 fs laser pulse of wavelength 0.8 μm focused to a waist radius of 1.6 μm. The initial electrons are randomly distributed in a sphere of diameter 1 μm. More details of the interaction in (b) are given in Fig. 2.
Figure 2Monoenergetic, relativistic electrons from laser-driven linear-field acceleration in free space. (a–d) depict the behavior of the optical and electron pulses at various times during the laser-electron interaction. These instants are marked with circles in (e), which show the evolution of the electron pulse’s mean kinetic energy as a function of distance (laser focus at z = 0). The final (f) normalized trace-space emittance and (g) energy distribution describe a relativistic, high-quality and quasi-monoenergetic electron pulse. The laser and electron pulse parameters from Fig. 1 were used here. Although the electron pulse eventually acquires a relatively large transverse size (see (f)), its low trace-space emittance implies that it is readily re-compressed with appropriate focusing elements (e.g., magnetic solenoid).
Figure 3Characteristics of the accelerated electron pulse, showing the insensitivity of laser-driven linear-field acceleration in free space to a wide range of parameter choices. The final (a) mean kinetic energy, (b) normalized trace-space emittance, and (c) energy spread are shown as a function of laser waist radius for various values of laser pulse energy and electron pulse charge. The shaded region between the dashed lines in (b) is to highlight the fact that for a wide range of parameters, the final emittance falls in the nm-rad range. We obtain each point by optimizing over the optical carrier phase and the relative displacement between electron and laser focal positions based on our FOM. (Dotted lines are included only as a visual guide).
Figure 4Determining optimal parameters for free space linear-field particle acceleration. The panels show large regimes of high-quality acceleration, allowing optimization of the scheme under different figures-of-merit (FOMs). (a) Mean kinetic energy, (b) energy spread, (c) normalized trace-space emittance and (d) FOM of the final electron bunch after acceleration as a function of the optical carrier phase and the position of the electron beam focus. Along the vertical axes, we vary the position of the interaction point (where the electron pulse reaches its focus) relative to the spatial focus of the laser. Along the horizontal axes, we vary the laser carrier phase across all possible phase delays. The laser pulse and initial electron pulse are identical to those used in Figs 1 and 2. In every case, the electron pulse is designed to reach its temporal focus and its spatial focus simultaneously. The temporal focus of the laser pulse is synchronized to coincide with that of the electron pulse. All properties are recorded long after the laser-electron interaction has ceased. The location corresponding to maximum net acceleration is marked with a circle (‘o’), whereas the location of the optimal solution according to our FOM (which takes emittance and energy spread into account; see text) is marked with a cross (‘x’). This optimal solution corresponds to the results in Figs 1 and 2.