| Literature DB >> 28894080 |
Filipe C Araújo, Alexandre Sepriano, Filipa Teixeira, Diogo Jesus, Teresa Martins Rocha, Patrícia Martins, Catarina Tenazinha, Ana Cordeiro, Ana Filipa Mourão, Cândida Silva, Carlos Vaz, Cátia Duarte, Cristina Ponte, Fernando Pimentel Dos Santos, Helena Canhão, Helena Santos, José Bravo Pimentão, José Canas da Silva, Joaquim Pereira, José António Pereira da Silva, Luís Cunha Miranda, Margarida Oliveira, Maria João Saavedra, Pedro Gonçalves, Sandra Falcão, Susana Capela, João Eurico Fonseca.
Abstract
Biosimilars are new and more affordable similar versions of previously approved reference biological drugs. Following the approval of the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar in 2013, the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology issued a position paper on the use of biosimilars in rheumatic conditions covering efficacy, safety, extrapolation, interchangeability, substitution and pharmacovigilance. However, as this is a rapidly evolving field, it was felt that the knowledge and evidence gathered since then justified an update of these statements. Literature searches on these issues were performed and the search results were presented and discussed in a national meeting. Portuguese rheumatologists considered that affordability should be taken into consideration when initiating a biological drug, but other factors were equally important. In patients already on reference biological treatment, switch to a more affordable biosimilar is desirable, provided a set of conditions is rigorously met. Automatic substitution is not acceptable and current evidence is insufficient to support interchangeability. Extrapolation of clinical indications is endorsed by Portuguese rheumatologists, and the statements on safety, pharmacovigilance and traceability are in accordance with the previous position paper.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28894080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Reumatol Port ISSN: 0303-464X Impact factor: 1.290