Keiichi Sumida1,2,3, Miklos Z Molnar1,4, Praveen K Potukuchi1, Koshy George1, Fridtjof Thomas5, Jun Ling Lu1, Kunihiro Yamagata3, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh6, Csaba P Kovesdy7,8. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and. 2. Nephrology Center, Toranomon Hospital Kajigaya, Kanagawa, Japan. 3. Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. 4. Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. 5. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 6. Harold Simmons Center for Chronic Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California; and. 7. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and ckovesdy@uthsc.edu. 8. Nephrology Section, Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Albuminuria is a robust predictor of CKD progression. However, little is known about the associations of changes in albuminuria with the risk of kidney events outside the settings of clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a nationwide cohort of 56,946 United States veterans with an eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, we examined the associations of 1-year fold changes in albuminuria with subsequent incident CKD (>25% decrease in eGFR reaching <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and rapid eGFR decline (eGFR slope <-5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year) assessed using Cox models and logistic regression, respectively, with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: The mean age was 64 (SD, 10) years old; 97% were men, and 91% were diabetic. There was a nearly linear association between 1-year fold changes in albuminuria and incident CKD. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of incident CKD associated with more than twofold decrease, 1.25- to twofold decrease, 1.25- to twofold increase, and more than twofold increase (versus <1.25-fold decrease to <1.25-fold increase) in albuminuria were 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.89), 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.00), 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.20), and 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.38), respectively. Qualitatively similar associations were present for rapid eGFR decline (adjusted odds ratios; 95% confidence intervals for corresponding albuminuria changes: adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.94; adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.07; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.29; and adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.54 and 1.81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Relative changes in albuminuria over a 1-year interval were linearly associated with subsequent risk of kidney outcomes. Additional studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the observed associations and test whether active interventions to lower elevated albuminuria can improve kidney outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Albuminuria is a robust predictor of CKD progression. However, little is known about the associations of changes in albuminuria with the risk of kidney events outside the settings of clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a nationwide cohort of 56,946 United States veterans with an eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, we examined the associations of 1-year fold changes in albuminuria with subsequent incident CKD (>25% decrease in eGFR reaching <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and rapid eGFR decline (eGFR slope <-5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year) assessed using Cox models and logistic regression, respectively, with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: The mean age was 64 (SD, 10) years old; 97% were men, and 91% were diabetic. There was a nearly linear association between 1-year fold changes in albuminuria and incident CKD. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of incident CKD associated with more than twofold decrease, 1.25- to twofold decrease, 1.25- to twofold increase, and more than twofold increase (versus <1.25-fold decrease to <1.25-fold increase) in albuminuria were 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.89), 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.00), 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.20), and 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.38), respectively. Qualitatively similar associations were present for rapid eGFR decline (adjusted odds ratios; 95% confidence intervals for corresponding albuminuria changes: adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.94; adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.07; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.29; and adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.54 and 1.81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Relative changes in albuminuria over a 1-year interval were linearly associated with subsequent risk of kidney outcomes. Additional studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the observed associations and test whether active interventions to lower elevated albuminuria can improve kidney outcomes.
Authors: Csaba P Kovesdy; Anthony J Bleyer; Miklos Z Molnar; Jennie Z Ma; John J Sim; William C Cushman; L Darryl Quarles; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ron T Gansevoort; Kunihiro Matsushita; Marije van der Velde; Brad C Astor; Mark Woodward; Andrew S Levey; Paul E de Jong; Josef Coresh Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: H C Gerstein; J F Mann; Q Yi; B Zinman; S F Dinneen; B Hoogwerf; J P Hallé; J Young; A Rashkow; C Joyce; S Nawaz; S Yusuf Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-07-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: C E Mogensen; E Vestbo; P L Poulsen; C Christiansen; E M Damsgaard; H Eiskjaer; A Frøland; K W Hansen; S Nielsen; M M Pedersen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns; Anita Lloyd; Matthew T James; Scott Klarenbach; Robert R Quinn; Natasha Wiebe; Marcello Tonelli Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Naim Issa; Lisa E Vaughan; Aleksandar Denic; Walter K Kremers; Harini A Chakkera; Walter D Park; Arthur J Matas; Sandra J Taler; Mark D Stegall; Joshua J Augustine; Andrew D Rule Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Josef Coresh; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Yingying Sang; Kunihiro Matsushita; Johan Arnlov; Brad C Astor; Corri Black; Nigel J Brunskill; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Harold I Feldman; Caroline S Fox; Lesley A Inker; Areef Ishani; Sadayoshi Ito; Simerjot Jassal; Tsuneo Konta; Kevan Polkinghorne; Solfrid Romundstad; Marit D Solbu; Nikita Stempniewicz; Benedicte Stengel; Marcello Tonelli; Mitsumasa Umesawa; Sushrut S Waikar; Chi-Pang Wen; Jack F M Wetzels; Mark Woodward; Morgan E Grams; Csaba P Kovesdy; Andrew S Levey; Ron T Gansevoort Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Jonathan P Troost; Howard Trachtman; Cathie Spino; Frederick J Kaskel; Aaron Friedman; Marva M Moxey-Mims; Richard N Fine; Jennifer J Gassman; Jeffrey B Kopp; Liron Walsh; Rong Wang; Debbie S Gipson Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 8.860