Literature DB >> 28893774

External Evaluation of Two Fluconazole Infant Population Pharmacokinetic Models.

Michael F Hwang1, Ryan J Beechinor1, Kelly C Wade2, Daniel K Benjamin3,4, P Brian Smith3,4, Christoph P Hornik3,4, Edmund V Capparelli5, Shahnaz Duara6, Kathleen A Kennedy7, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez3,4, Daniel Gonzalez8.   

Abstract

Fluconazole is an antifungal agent used for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) models of fluconazole in infants have been previously published by Wade et al. (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:4043-4049, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00569-08) and Momper et al. (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5539-5545, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00963-16). Here we report the results of the first external evaluation of the predictive performance of both models. We used patient-level data from both studies to externally evaluate both PK models. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the model prediction error (PE), mean prediction error (MPE), mean absolute prediction error (MAPE), prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC), and normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE). The values of the parameters of each model were reestimated using both the external and merged data sets. When evaluated with the external data set, the model proposed by Wade et al. showed lower median PE, MPE, and MAPE (0.429 μg/ml, 41.9%, and 57.6%, respectively) than the model proposed by Momper et al. (2.45 μg/ml, 188%, and 195%, respectively). The values of the majority of reestimated parameters were within 20% of their respective original parameter values for all model evaluations. Our analysis determined that though both models are robust, the model proposed by Wade et al. had greater accuracy and precision than the model proposed by Momper et al., likely because it was derived from a patient population with a wider age range. This study highlights the importance of the external evaluation of infant population PK models.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  external evaluation; fluconazole; infant; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28893774      PMCID: PMC5700313          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01352-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.938


  18 in total

1.  Xpose--an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM.

Authors:  E N Jonsson; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months.

Authors:  Daniel K Benjamin; Barbara J Stoll; Avory A Fanaroff; Scott A McDonald; William Oh; Rosemary D Higgins; Shahnaz Duara; Kenneth Poole; Abbot Laptook; Ronald Goldberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Neonatal candidiasis: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment.

Authors:  Daniel K Benjamin; Barbara J Stoll; Marie G Gantz; Michele C Walsh; Pablo J Sánchez; Abhik Das; Seetha Shankaran; Rosemary D Higgins; Kathy J Auten; Nancy A Miller; Thomas J Walsh; Abbot R Laptook; Waldemar A Carlo; Kathleen A Kennedy; Neil N Finer; Shahnaz Duara; Kurt Schibler; Rachel L Chapman; Krisa P Van Meurs; Ivan D Frantz; Dale L Phelps; Brenda B Poindexter; Edward F Bell; T Michael O'Shea; Kristi L Watterberg; Ronald N Goldberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Evaluation of different tests based on observations for external model evaluation of population analyses.

Authors:  Karl Brendel; Emmanuelle Comets; Céline Laffont; France Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in young infants.

Authors:  K C Wade; D Wu; D A Kaufman; R M Ward; D K Benjamin; J E Sullivan; N Ramey; B Jayaraman; K Hoppu; P C Adamson; M R Gastonguay; J S Barrett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Martin Bergstrand; Andrew C Hooker; Johan E Wallin; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants during the first two weeks of life.

Authors:  H Saxén; K Hoppu; M Pohjavuori
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

9.  Pharmacokinetics of oral fluconazole in premature infants.

Authors:  T G Wenzl; J Schefels; H Hörnchen; H Skopnik
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Fluconazole in Premature Infants with Birth Weights Less than 750 Grams.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Momper; Edmund V Capparelli; Kelly C Wade; Anand Kantak; Ramasubbareddy Dhanireddy; James J Cummings; Jonathan H Nedrelow; Mark L Hudak; Gratias T Mundakel; Girija Natarajan; Jamie Gao; Matt Laughon; P Brian Smith; Daniel K Benjamin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.938

View more
  5 in total

1.  Can Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics be Extrapolated? Implications of External Evaluations.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Chen-Yu Wang; Zi-Ran Li; Yan Pan; Mao-Bai Liu; Zheng Jiao
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluconazole Using Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples From Preterm and Term Infants.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Gerhart; Kevin M Watt; Andrea Edginton; Kelly C Wade; Sara N Salerno; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith; Christoph P Hornik; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Shahnaz Duara; Ashley Ross; Karen Shattuck; Dan L Stewart; Natalie Neu; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-22

3.  Investigating auranofin for the treatment of infected diabetic pressure ulcers in mice and dermal toxicity in pigs.

Authors:  Haroon Mohammad; Nader S Abutaleb; Alexandra M Dieterly; L Tiffany Lyle; Mohamed N Seleem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The Blind Spot of Pharmacology: A Scoping Review of Drug Metabolism in Prematurely Born Children.

Authors:  Mette Louise Mørk; Jón Trærup Andersen; Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen; Christina Gade
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  External Evaluation of Risperidone Population Pharmacokinetic Models Using Opportunistic Pediatric Data.

Authors:  Eleni Karatza; Samit Ganguly; Chi D Hornik; William J Muller; Amira Al-Uzri; Laura James; Stephen J Balevic; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.