Literature DB >> 28893773

Colistin Is Extensively Lost during Standard In Vitro Experimental Conditions.

Matti Karvanen1, Christer Malmberg2, Pernilla Lagerbäck2, Lena E Friberg3, Otto Cars2.   

Abstract

Colistin adheres to a range of materials, including plastics in labware. The loss caused by adhesion influences an array of methods detrimentally, including MIC assays and in vitro time-kill experiments. The aim of this study was to characterize the extent and time course of colistin loss in different types of laboratory materials during a simulated time-kill experiment without bacteria or plasma proteins present. Three types of commonly used large test tubes, i.e., soda-lime glass, polypropylene, and polystyrene, were studied, as well as two different polystyrene microplates and low-protein-binding microtubes. The tested concentration range was 0.125 to 8 mg/liter colistin base. Exponential one-phase and two-phase functions were fitted to the data, and the adsorption of colistin to the materials was modeled with the Langmuir adsorption model. In the large test tubes, the measured start concentrations ranged between 44 and 102% of the expected values, and after 24 h, the concentrations ranged between 8 and 90%. The half-lives of colistin loss were 0.9 to 12 h. The maximum binding capacities of the three materials ranged between 0.4 and 1.1 μg/cm2, and the equilibrium constants ranged between 0.10 and 0.54 ml/μg. The low-protein-binding microtubes showed start concentrations between 63 and 99% and concentrations at 24 h of between 59 and 90%. In one of the microplates, the start concentrations were below the lower limit of quantification at worst. In conclusion, to minimize the effect of colistin loss due to adsorption, our study indicates that low-protein-binding polypropylene should be used when possible for measuring colistin concentrations in experimental settings, and the results discourage the use of polystyrene. Furthermore, when diluting colistin in protein-free media, the number of dilution steps should be minimized.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adsorption; colistin; in vitro

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28893773      PMCID: PMC5655071          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00857-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  23 in total

Review 1.  Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane.

Authors:  M Vaara
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-09

2.  The Vroman effect: a molecular level description of fibrinogen displacement.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Jung; Soon-Mi Lim; Fernando Albertorio; Gibum Kim; Marc C Gurau; Richard D Yang; Matthew A Holden; Paul S Cremer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Adsorption of ions, polyelectrolytes and proteins.

Authors:  M A Stuart; G J Fleer; J Lyklema; W Norde; J M Scheutjens
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.984

4.  Application of a loading dose of colistin methanesulfonate in critically ill patients: population pharmacokinetics, protein binding, and prediction of bacterial kill.

Authors:  Ami F Mohamed; Ilias Karaiskos; Diamantis Plachouras; Matti Karvanen; Konstantinos Pontikis; Britt Jansson; Evangelos Papadomichelakis; Anastasia Antoniadou; Helen Giamarellou; Apostolos Armaganidis; Otto Cars; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins: where are we now?

Authors:  Romney M Humphries
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 6.  Adsorption of proteins from solution at the solid-liquid interface.

Authors:  W Norde
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.984

7.  A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model based on in vitro time-kill data predicts the in vivo PK/PD index of colistin.

Authors:  David D Khan; Lena E Friberg; Elisabet I Nielsen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Additivity of action between polysorbate 80 and polymyxin B towards spheroplasts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 6750.

Authors:  M R Brown; E M Geaton; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.765

9.  Elucidation of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic determinant of colistin activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in murine thigh and lung infection models.

Authors:  Rajesh V Dudhani; John D Turnidge; Kingsley Coulthard; Robert W Milne; Craig R Rayner; Jian Li; Roger L Nation
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Dynamic interaction of colistin and meropenem on a WT and a resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as quantified in a PK/PD model.

Authors:  Ami F Mohamed; Anders N Kristoffersson; Matti Karvanen; Elisabet I Nielsen; Otto Cars; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Polymyxins: Challenges, Issues, and Recommendations.

Authors:  Fereshteh Ezadi; Abdollah Ardebili; Reza Mirnejad
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A Whole-Cell Screen Identifies Small Bioactives That Synergize with Polymyxin and Exhibit Antimicrobial Activities against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Shawn M Zimmerman; Audrey-Ann J Lafontaine; Carmen M Herrera; Amanda B Mclean; M Stephen Trent
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Is Colistin Susceptibility Testing Finally on the Right Track?

Authors:  Núria Prim; Alba Rivera; Pere Coll; Beatriz Mirelis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Reply to Prim et al., "Is Colistin Susceptibility Testing Finally on the Right Track?"

Authors:  Matti Karvanen; Christer Malmberg; Pernilla Lagerbäck; Lena E Friberg; Otto Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of Non-Tissue Culture- versus Tissue Culture-Treated Microplates for Oritavancin Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Qun Yan; Melissa J Karau; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  A Population WB-PBPK Model of Colistin and its Prodrug CMS in Pigs: Focus on the Renal Distribution and Excretion.

Authors:  Alexis Viel; Jérôme Henri; Salim Bouchène; Julian Laroche; Jean-Guy Rolland; Jacqueline Manceau; Michel Laurentie; William Couet; Nicolas Grégoire
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Evaluation of co-delivery of colistin and ciprofloxacin in liposomes using an in vitro human lung epithelial cell model.

Authors:  Guihong Chai; Heejun Park; Shihui Yu; Fanfan Zhou; Jian Li; Qingguo Xu; Qi Tony Zhou
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.875

8.  Colistin Heteroresistance and Involvement of the PmrAB Regulatory System in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Yannick Charretier; Seydina M Diene; Damien Baud; Sonia Chatellier; Emmanuelle Santiago-Allexant; Alex van Belkum; Ghislaine Guigon; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Rescuing the Last-Line Polymyxins: Achievements and Challenges.

Authors:  Sue C Nang; Mohammad A K Azad; Tony Velkov; Qi Tony Zhou; Jian Li
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 25.468

10.  Manual Reading of Sensititre Broth Microdilution System Panels Improves Accuracy of Susceptibility Reporting for Polymyxin Antibiotics.

Authors:  Michelle M Bellerose; Andrew E Clark; Jung-Ho Youn; Rebecca A Weingarten; Chelsea M Crooks; John P Dekker; Karen M Frank
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.