| Literature DB >> 28893550 |
Annette Blaich1, Andreas Buser2, Marcel Stöckle3, Christian Gehringer4, Hans H Hirsch5, Manuel Battegay6, Thomas Klimkait7, Reno Frei8.
Abstract
This study aimed at assessing the specificity of the Elecsys® HIV combi PT in comparison to the ARCHITECT® HIV Ag/Ab Combo. With both of these assays, 3997 unselected sera from patients of a tertiary health care centre in Basel, Switzerland, were screened for HIV. Reactive sera were reanalysed on the VIDAS® HIV Duo Ultra to identify false-reactive specimens prior to confirmation by quantitative PCR and line immunoassay. The Elecsys® compared to the ARCHITECT® shows a similar specificity (99.7% versus 99.8%) but a slightly lower positive predictive value (71.8% versus 80%). Samples tested with a cut-off index (COI) between 0.91 and 4.85 (cut-off <0.9) with the Elecsys® and with a signal to cut-off index (S/CO) between 1.09 and 12.49 (cut-off <1.0) with the ARCHITECT® were false-reactive. There was no false-reactive result with the VIDAS®. Of the false-reactive samples, 66.7% could be related to patient-specific underlying conditions. The HIV two-tiered diagnostic algorithm proposed in this work improved the positive predictive values of the Elecsys® or ARCHITECT® to 100% when the results of the VIDAS® were included. Values just above the cut-off are highly suspicious to be false-reactive and high COI or S/CO ratios are associated with true positivity.Entities:
Keywords: False reactive results; Fourth generation immunoassays; HIV; Specificity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28893550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.09.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol Methods ISSN: 0166-0934 Impact factor: 2.014