Literature DB >> 28893379

Comparison of Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Off-Hours Versus On-Hours.

Tariq H Enezate1, Jad Omran2, Ashraf S Al-Dadah3, Martin Alpert4, Ehtisham Mahmud2, Mitul Patel2, Herbert D Aronow5, Deepak L Bhatt6.   

Abstract

Previous studies have reported worse outcomes and longer door-to-balloon times (DBTs) in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after normal working hours, during weekends, and on holidays (off-hours) compared with normal business hours (on-hours). Recent studies, however, have reported similar outcomes regardless of presentation time. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried from January 1990 through December 2016. Only studies comparing STEMI outcomes during off-hours versus on-hours with percutaneous coronary intervention were included. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to pool outcomes across the studies. Clinical end points included short- (<30 days of presentation), intermediate- (at 1 to 2 years), and long-term (at 3 to 4 years) stent thrombosis, mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A total of 86,776 patients (62 years and 74.5% male) were identified from 39 studies. There was no significant difference between both groups with regard to mean DBT (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.73 to 4.22, p = 0.67) or median DBT (p = 0.19). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for short-term end points including mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.25, p = 0.08), MI (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.74, p = 0.18), MACE (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.20, p = 0.40), or stent thrombosis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.82, p = 0.31). Similarly, intermediate-term end points were not statistically different for mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.05, p = 0.46), MI (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.02, p = 0.08), or MACE (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.08, p = 0.98). Long-term end points did not differ statistically between groups for mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.09, p = 0.46), MI (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.84, p = 0.44), or MACE (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.08, p = 0.67). In conclusion, patients presenting with STEMI during off-hours and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention had similar short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes compared with patients presenting during on-hours. DBT was not affected by the time of presentation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28893379     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Impact of a telemedicine-guided, population-based, STEMI network on reperfusion strategy, efficiency, and outcomes: Impact of telemedicine on STEMI management.

Authors:  Sameer Mehta; Haytham Aboushi; Carlos Campos; Roberto Botelho; Francisco Fernandez; Daniel Rodriguez; Mario Torres; Daniel Vieria; Alejandra Frauenfelder; Gladys Pinto; Claudia Lopez; Maria Acosta
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-07

2.  Weekend Effect in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000-2016.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Sri Harsha Patlolla; P Elliott Miller; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Malcolm R Bell; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-06-12

3.  Long-term outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated according to hospital visit time.

Authors:  Seok Oh; Dae Young Hyun; Kyung Hoon Cho; Ju Han Kim; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.165

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.