| Literature DB >> 28893205 |
Ping-Jui Tsai1,2, Ming-Kai Hsieh3,4,5, Kuo-Feng Fan1,2, Lih-Huei Chen1,2, Chia-Wei Yu1,2, Po-Liang Lai1,2, Chi-Chien Niu1,2, Tsung-Ting Tsai1,2, Wen-Jer Chen1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Burst fracture is a common thoracolumbar injury that is treated using posterior pedicle instrumentation and fusion combined with transpedicular intracorporeal grafting after reduction. In this study, we compared the outcome of these two techniques by using radiologic imaging and functional outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Acute thoracolumbar burst fracture; Burst fracture; Calcium sulfate/phosphate cement; Kyphoplasty; Vertebroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28893205 PMCID: PMC5594435 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1753-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Patient demographics data
| Characteristic | Kyphoplasty | Vertebroplasty |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 31 | 30 | 0.91 |
| Age | 35.5 ± 6.5 | 41.2 ± 6.8 | 0.814 |
| Gender: female (%) | 14 (54%) | 12 (48%) | 0.258 |
| Location of fractured vertebrae | |||
| Thoracic (T8–T10) | 4 | 2 | |
| T–L (T11–L1)aw | 21 | 19 | 0.390 |
| Lumbar (L2–L3) | 6 | 9 | |
| Neurological status (ASIA | |||
| A | 1 | 6 | |
| B | 0 | 2 | |
| C | 2 | 2 | 0.456 |
| D | 2 | 1 | |
| E | 26 | 19 | |
| Hospital stay | 12.5 ± 2.55 | 13 ± 3 | 0.551 |
ASIA+: American Spine Injury Association impairment scale [17]
Operative data
| Operative Characteristic | Kyphoplasty | Vertebroplasty |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Short (1 above and 1 below fractured vertebra) | 19 | 16 | 0.312 |
| Long (2 above and 2 below fractured vertebra) | 12 | 14 | |
| Blood loss (ml) | 265 ± 25 | 215 ± 85 | 0.058 |
| Operative time (minutes) | 125 ± 26 | 115 ± 14 | 0.25 |
| Follow-up | 29.5 ± 5.5 | 28.5 ± 4.5 | 0.462 |
| Volume injected (ml) | 12 ± 2.5 | 6.5 ± 1.5 | <0.01 |
Fig. 1Radiographic image of kyphoplasty technique. Kyphoplasty was performed using a cannula and an expander, which were inserted into the pedicle, as well as a drill, which was inserted through the cannula. A needle pipe and pin was placed parallel to the superior endplate in the lateral view (a). The balloon was slowly inflated with initial bulk pressure (b and c). The volume of the balloon was carefully controlled to restore the fractured vertebra until adequate kyphotic angle reduction was obtained or the inflation pressure reached 220 psi [19]. The operator should record the amount of injected fluid to predict the cement volume. The balloon was deflated and withdrawn (d), and the created cavity was filled with cement [19]
Fig. 2Radiographic image of one patient who received kypoplasty and long instrumentation. a. Lateral roentgenogram of a 25-year-old female patient showing a burst fracture of L2; the kyphotic angle is 30°. b. Postoperative lateral X-ray 3 days after surgery showing excellent restoration after kyphoplasty and long instrumentation; the kyphotic angle is −6°. c. Intact implant and kyphotic angle is −3° three months after surgery. d. Solid anterior fusion (continuous trabeculae of bridging anterior osteophytes without halo signs of screws) was achived and kyphotic angle was 0° 12 months after surgery
Fig. 3Vertebroplasty technique and cement leakage. Vertebroplasty was performed by inserting a cannula into the fractured vertebra (a). Calcium sulfate/phosphate cement was injected when the cannula tip reached the defect of the fractured vertebra under fluoroscopic monitoring (b, c). Intradiscal leakage and poor body reduction were noted during vertebroplasty (d)
Fig. 4Radiographic image of one patient who received vetebralplasty and short instrumentation. a. Lateral roentgenogram of a 35-year-old male patient showing a L3 burst fracture; the kyphotic angle is 20°. b. Postoperative lateral roentgenogram showing good reduction (the kyphotic angle is 0 degree) through vertebroplasty and short instrumentation with intradiscal and paraspinal leakages 3 days after surgery. c. The kyphotic angle is −3° 12months after surgery and solid anterior fusion (continuous trabeculae of bridging anterior osteophytes without halo signs of screws) was achived. But the kyphotic angle is 12 degree and the rod was bended 12 months after surgery
Fig. 5Comparisons of the kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in anterior vertebral height (a), kyphotic angle (b), mean VAS (c) and ODI (d) at baseline and follow-up. Group calculated means and 95% confidence intervals are shown in panels A, B, C and D. In panels A and B, the treatment p value refers to the average treatment effect difference (*, p < 0.05) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. In panels C and D, no clinical treatment effect difference was found at pre-operative and post-operative follow-up
Fig. 6Comparisons of cement leakage between the kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty groups. Leakages of cement were classified into three different types [22]: type B, through the basivertebral vein; type S, through the segmental vein; and type C, through a cortical defect including three patterns in C-type leakage (i.e., paraspinal, intradiscal, and posterior). Kyphoplasty resulted in considerably less cement extravasation (29%) than vertebroplasty (77%). In our series, leakage into the spinal canal (C-posterior type leakage) is significant in the vertebroplasty group (14% in the vertebroplasty group to 0% in the kyphoplasty group)
Fig. 7Cement leakage into the spinal canal after vertebroplasty. Vertebroplasty without balloon inflation causes cement leakage through the cortical disruption as detected on postoperative computed tomography scanning (a, b)