Purushothaman Senthil1, S Sudhakar2, S Porcelvan3, T G Tilak Francis4, D Rathnamala5, R Radhakrishnan6. 1. Research Scholar, School of Physiotherapy, Vel's University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Research committee, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Vel's University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Mohamed Sathak A J College of Physiotherapy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Mohamed Sathak A J College of Physiotherapy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The postural adaptation is very common now a days in school going children, office desk oriented job, computer users and frequent mobile users, and in all major industrial workers. Several studies have documented a high incidence of postural abnormalities in a given population; however, methods of postural measurement were poorly defined. The implication of postural pro software to analyse the postural imbalance of upper body dysfunction is very rare and literature studies says that the kinematic changes in particular segment will produce pain/discomfort and thereby lesser productivity of subjects. AIM: To evaluate the postural changes in subjects with upper body dysfunction after acorrective exercise strategy using postural analysis software and pectoralis minor muscle length testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After explaining the procedure and benefits, informed consent was taken from the participating subjects (age 25-55 years). Subjects with upper body dysfunction were randomly allocated into two groups (each group 30 subjects). The Group-A received the corrective exercise strategy and Group-B received the conventional exercise for eight weeks of study duration (15 reps each exercise, total duration of 40 min; four days/week. Pre and Post posture analysis were analysed using posture pro software along with flexibility of pectoralis minor was assessed using ruler scale method. RESULTS: After interpretation of data, both the group showed the postural alteration and pectoralis minor muscle length changes, p-value (p<0.01) of both group showed highly significant changes. But comparing the both groups, the subjects who received the corrective exercise strategy shown more percentage of improvement in posture alteration (56.25%), pectoralis minor muscle length changes (68.69%) than the conventional exercise received subjects in posture alteration (24.86%) and pectoralis minor muscle length changes (21.9%). CONCLUSION: Altered postural changes and pectoralis minor muscle flexibility before and after the corrective exercise strategy evaluated by postural analysis software method shown to be a significant tool in clinical practice, which is easier and reproducible method.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The postural adaptation is very common now a days in school going children, office desk oriented job, computer users and frequent mobile users, and in all major industrial workers. Several studies have documented a high incidence of postural abnormalities in a given population; however, methods of postural measurement were poorly defined. The implication of postural pro software to analyse the postural imbalance of upper body dysfunction is very rare and literature studies says that the kinematic changes in particular segment will produce pain/discomfort and thereby lesser productivity of subjects. AIM: To evaluate the postural changes in subjects with upper body dysfunction after a corrective exercise strategy using postural analysis software and pectoralis minor muscle length testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After explaining the procedure and benefits, informed consent was taken from the participating subjects (age 25-55 years). Subjects with upper body dysfunction were randomly allocated into two groups (each group 30 subjects). The Group-A received the corrective exercise strategy and Group-B received the conventional exercise for eight weeks of study duration (15 reps each exercise, total duration of 40 min; four days/week. Pre and Post posture analysis were analysed using posture pro software along with flexibility of pectoralis minor was assessed using ruler scale method. RESULTS: After interpretation of data, both the group showed the postural alteration and pectoralis minor muscle length changes, p-value (p<0.01) of both group showed highly significant changes. But comparing the both groups, the subjects who received the corrective exercise strategy shown more percentage of improvement in posture alteration (56.25%), pectoralis minor muscle length changes (68.69%) than the conventional exercise received subjects in posture alteration (24.86%) and pectoralis minor muscle length changes (21.9%). CONCLUSION: Altered postural changes and pectoralis minor muscle flexibility before and after the corrective exercise strategy evaluated by postural analysis software method shown to be a significant tool in clinical practice, which is easier and reproducible method.
Entities:
Keywords:
Intervention; Pectoralis minor flexibility; Posture deviation