Literature DB >> 28892948

Microperimetry - A New Tool for Assessing Retinal Sensitivity in Macular Diseases.

Memota Laishram1, Krishnagopal Srikanth2, A R Rajalakshmi3, Swathi Nagarajan4, G Ezhumalai5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Macular disease is the leading cause of low vision in the Western world. Drusen and pigmentary irregularities are common among the rural Northern Indian population. The disease process leads to loss of central vision, metamorphopsia, macropsia or micropsia and colour vision defect. AIM: To study the retinal sensitivity changes in macular diseases using microperimetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an observational study, conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at a rural tertiary care hospital. This study was started from December 2014 until June 2016, in all patients with macular disease above the age of 20 years attending the outpatient department. Microperimetry was done for 84 eyes of 52 patients with macular disease. Mean retinal Sensitivity (MS) and fixation stability was evaluated. The statistical analysis of mean retinal sensitivity, central 2° and 4° fixation was done by calculating the mean and standard deviation using 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: The range of age was between 20-81 years. Majority were 32 males (62%) and 20 females (38%). Out of the 84 eyes studied, majority of the macular disease were Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (50%). Rest 50% were other macular diseases. The mean retinal sensitivity (dB) shown by microperimetry was 10.83 in AMD, 9.12 in Cystoid Macular Oedema (CME), 10.34 in Epiretinal Membrane (ERM), 10.74 in Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED), 8.96 in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR), 6.43 in macular dystrophy, 7.15 in Lamellar Hole (LMH), 9.8 in Pseudomacular Hole (PMH), 3 in geographic atrophy, 11.1 in macular telangiectasia, 5.6 in Berlin oedema, 12.3 in macular scar and 15.2 in haemorrhage in macula. The study showed 64% of the eyes had stable 2° central fixation, 35% had relatively unstable fixation and 1% had unstable fixation. No significant correlation between retinal sensitivity and retinal thickness in AMD was found.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that microperimetry can be a useful tool for objective evaluation of macular function and progression of the disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entoptic imagery; Macular function; Microperimetric examination

Year:  2017        PMID: 28892948      PMCID: PMC5583893          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25799.10213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  24 in total

1.  Assessment of macular function by microperimetry in intermediate age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  U A Dinc; M Yenerel; E Gorgun; M Oncel
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  Scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging stabilized microperimetry in dry age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Kathrin I Hartmann; Dirk-Uwe G Bartsch; Lingyun Cheng; Jae S Kim; Maria L Gomez; Helaina Klein; William R Freeman
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy.

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; T Fendrich; M Becker; H Krastel; F E Kruse; H E Völcker
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual acuity and microperimetric mapping of lesion area in eyes with inflammatory cystoid macular oedema.

Authors:  Marion R Munk; Christopher G Kiss; Wolfgang Huf; Alessio Montuoro; Florian Sulzbacher; Maria Kroh; Michael Larsen; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  A statistical analysis of metamorphopsia in 7106 amsler grids.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Kameran Lashkari; Steven C Dakin; Peter Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease.

Authors:  C A Hazel; K L Petre; R A Armstrong; M T Benson; N A Frost
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Macular sensitivity in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  H Ozdemir; F Senturk; M Karacorlu; S Arf Karacorlu; O Uysal
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Macular function and morphologic features in juvenile stargardt disease: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Francesco Testa; Paolo Melillo; Valentina Di Iorio; Ada Orrico; Marcella Attanasio; Settimio Rossi; Francesca Simonelli
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marco Dal Vecchio; Carlo Lavia; Marco Nassisi; Federico M Grignolo; Antonio M Fea
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Retinal sensitivity in healthy Indians using microperimeter.

Authors:  Laxmi Gella; Muneeswar Gupta Nittala; Rajiv Raman
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes.

Authors:  Declan C Murphy; Jon Rees; David Hw Steel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

2.  Functional Outcome After Macular Hole Surgery: Comparison of Standard Perimetry with Microperimetry.

Authors:  Juliana Wons; Isabel B Pfister; Stefano Anastasi; Sonja Steinhauer; Sophie-Alexia Niderprim; Justus G Garweg
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-11

3.  Secondary Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Plug due to Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Hole OCT-Angiography and Microperimetry Features: Case Series.

Authors:  Dominika Wrzesińska; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Dominika Nowakowska; Mario Damiano Toro; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Michele Reibaldi; Teresio Avitabile; Robert Rejdak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Functional evaluation with microperimetry in large idiopathic macular holes treated by a free internal limiting membrane flap tamponade technique.

Authors:  Peirong Huang; Hong Wang; Fenge Chen; Jieqiong Chen; Yifan Hu; Junran Sun; Jingyang Feng; Hong Zhu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Vertical and Horizontal M-Charts and Microperimetry for Assessment of the Visual Function in Patients after Vitrectomy with ILM Peeling due to Stage 4 Macular Hole.

Authors:  Dominika Wrzesińska; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Dominika Nowakowska; Agnieszka Brzozowska; Teresio Avitabile; Michele Reibaldi; Robert Rejdak; Mario Toro
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Correlation of macular sensitivity measures and visual acuity to vision-related quality of life in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Thomas Richard Johansen Forshaw; Alexandra Kalia Parpounas; Torben Lykke Sørensen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Two-Photon Microperimetry: A Media Opacity-Independent Retinal Function Assay.

Authors:  Ang Wei; Urmi V Mehta; Grazyna Palczewska; Anton M Palma; Vincent M Hussey; Luke E Hoffmann; Anna Diep; Kevin Nguyen; Bryan Le; Steven Yone-Shun Chang; Andrew W Browne
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 8.  CURRENT CONCEPTS AND MODALITIES FOR MONITORING THE FELLOW EYE IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: An Expert Panel Consensus.

Authors:  Tien Yin Wong; Paolo Lanzetta; Francesco Bandello; Bora Eldem; Rafael Navarro; Monica Lövestam-Adrian; Anat Loewenstein
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.975

9.  Analysis of Macular Microperimetry Characteristics in Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Hongxia Gong; Huilan Wang; Nan Zhou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-11-20

10.  Effects of Intravitreal Aflibercept on Retinal Function and Improvement of Macular Edema Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Ichio; Masahiko Sugimoto; Hisashi Matsubara; Daiki Mochida; Kumiko Kato; Mineo Kondo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.