Literature DB >> 28892876

Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted from 2G and 3G Cell Phone on Developing Liver of Chick Embryo - A Comparative Study.

Mary Hydrina D'Silva1, Rijied Thompson Swer2, J Anbalagan3, Bhargavan Rajesh4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The increasing scientific evidence of various health hazards on exposure of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) emitted from both the cell phones and base stations have caused significant media attention and public discussion in recent years. The mechanism of interaction of RF fields with developing tissues of children and fetuses may be different from that of adults due to their smaller physical size and variation in tissue electromagnetic properties. The present study may provide an insight into the basic mechanisms by which RF fields interact with developing tissues in an embryo. AIM: To evaluate the possible tissue and DNA damage in developing liver of chick embryo following chronic exposure to Ultra-High Frequency/Radiofrequency Radiation (UHF/RFR) emitted from 2G and 3G cell phone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fertilized chick embryos were incubated in four groups. Group A-experimental group exposed to 2G radiation (60 eggs), Group B- experimental group exposed to 3G radiation (60 eggs), Group C- sham exposed control group (60 eggs) and Group D- control group (48 eggs). On completion of scheduled duration, the embryos were collected and processed for routine histological studies to check structural changes in liver. The nuclear diameter and karyorrhexis changes of hepatocytes were analysed using oculometer and square reticule respectively. The liver procured from one batch of eggs from all the four groups was subjected to alkaline comet assay technique to assess DNA damage. The results were compared using one-way ANOVA test.
RESULTS: In our study, the exposure of developing chick embryos to 2G and 3G cell phone radiations caused structural changes in liver in the form of dilated sinusoidal spaces with haemorrhage, increased vacuolations in cytoplasm, increased nuclear diameter and karyorrhexis and significantly increased DNA damage.
CONCLUSION: The chronic exposure of chick embryo liver to RFR emitted from 2G and 3G cell phone resulted in various structural changes and DNA damage. The changes were more pronounced in 3G experimental group. Based on these findings it is necessary to create awareness among public about the possible ill effects of RFR exposure from cell phone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell phone radiation; Cytoplasmic vacuolations; DNA damage; Double strand breaks; Hydropic changes; Karyorrhexis; Nucleomegaly

Year:  2017        PMID: 28892876      PMCID: PMC5583901          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26360.10275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  26 in total

1.  The effect of melatonin on morphological changes in liver induced by magnetic field exposure in rats.

Authors:  Alpaslan Gökcimen; Fehmi Ozgüner; Erdal Karaöz; Sükrü Ozen; Gülsen Aydin
Journal:  Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn       Date:  2002-05

2.  Single-strand DNA breaks in human hair root cells exposed to mobile phone radiation.

Authors:  Semra Tepe Çam; Nesrin Seyhan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Nonthermal effects of radiofrequency-field exposure on calcium dynamics in stem cell-derived neuronal cells: elucidation of calcium pathways.

Authors:  V S Rao; I A Titushkin; E G Moros; W F Pickard; H S Thatte; M R Cho
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Effect of low power microwave on the mouse genome: a direct DNA analysis.

Authors:  S Sarkar; S Ali; J Behari
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Protective effects of melatonin and caffeic acid phenethyl ester against retinal oxidative stress in long-term use of mobile phone: a comparative study.

Authors:  Fehmi Ozguner; Yavuz Bardak; Selcuk Comlekci
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.396

6.  Exposure of rat brain to 915 MHz GSM microwaves induces changes in gene expression but not double stranded DNA breaks or effects on chromatin conformation.

Authors:  Igor Y Belyaev; Catrin Bauréus Koch; Olle Terenius; Katarina Roxström-Lindquist; Lars O G Malmgren; Wolfgang H Sommer; Leif G Salford; Bertil R R Persson
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  Derangement of chick embryo retinal differentiation caused by radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Nusrat Zareen; Muhammad Yunus Khan; Liaqat Ali Minhas
Journal:  Congenit Anom (Kyoto)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.409

8.  Non-thermal effects in the microwave induced unfolding of proteins observed by chaperone binding.

Authors:  Doaa F George; Marcela M Bilek; David R McKenzie
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Microwave radiation enhances teratogenic effect of cytosine arabinoside in mice.

Authors:  J Marcickiewicz; B Chazan; T Niemiec; G Sokolska; M Troszyński; M Luczak; S Szmigielski
Journal:  Biol Neonate       Date:  1986

10.  Microwaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53BP1 and gamma-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons.

Authors:  Eva Markovà; Lena Hillert; Lars Malmgren; Bertil R R Persson; Igor Y Belyaev
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Potential influence of prenatal 2.45 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on Wistar albino rat testis.

Authors:  Viera Almášiová; Katarína Holovská; Sandra Andrašková; Viera Cigánková; Zuzana Ševčíková; Adam Raček; Zuzana Andrejčáková; Katarína Beňová; Štefan Tóth; Eva Tvrdá; Ján Molnár; Enikö Račeková
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.