Literature DB >> 28892581

Direct current stimulation modulates the excitability of the sensory and motor fibres in the human posterior tibial nerve, with a long-lasting effect on the H-reflex.

Francesco Bolzoni1,2, Roberto Esposti1, Carlo Bruttini1, Giuseppe Zenoni1, Elzbieta Jankowska2, Paolo Cavallari1.   

Abstract

Several studies demonstrated that transcutaneous direct current stimulation (DCS) may modulate central nervous system excitability. However, much less is known about how DC affects peripheral nerve fibres. We investigated the action of DCS on motor and sensory fibres of the human posterior tibial nerve, with supplementary analysis in acute experiments on rats. In forty human subjects, electric pulses at the popliteal fossa were used to elicit either M-waves or H-reflexes in the Soleus, before (15 min), during (10 min) and after (30 min) DCS. Cathodal or anodal current (2 mA) was applied to the same nerve. Cathodal DCS significantly increased the H-reflex amplitude; the post-polarization effect lasted up to ~ 25 min after the termination of DCS. Anodal DCS instead significantly decreased the reflex amplitude for up to ~ 5 min after DCS end. DCS effects on M-wave showed the same polarity dependence but with considerably shorter after-effects, which never exceeded 5 min. DCS changed the excitability of both motor and sensory fibres. These effects and especially the long-lasting modulation of the H-reflex suggest a possible rehabilitative application of DCS that could be applied either to compensate an altered peripheral excitability or to modulate the afferent transmission to spinal and supraspinal structures. In animal experiments, DCS was applied, under anaesthesia, to either the exposed peroneus nerve or its Dorsal Root, and its effects closely resembled those found in human subjects. They validate therefore the use of the animal models for future investigations on the DCS mechanisms.
© 2017 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990DCSzzm321990; M-wave; human; neuromodulation; peripheral nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28892581     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  4 in total

1.  Branching points of primary afferent fibers are vital for the modulation of fiber excitability by epidural DC polarization and by GABA in the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Yaqing Li; Krishnapriya Hari; Ana M Lucas-Osma; Keith K Fenrich; David J Bennett; Ingela Hammar; Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments.

Authors:  Silvia M Marchese; Roberto Esposti; Francesco Bolzoni; Paolo Cavallari
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 3.  Is there hope that transpinal direct current stimulation corrects motoneuron excitability and provides neuroprotection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?

Authors:  Marcin Bączyk; Piotr Krutki; Daniel Zytnicki
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-01

4.  Modulation of H-reflex responses and frequency-dependent depression by repetitive spinal electromagnetic stimulation: From rats to humans and back to chronic spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Hayk Petrosyan; Li Liang; Asrat Tesfa; Sue A Sisto; Magda Fahmy; Victor L Arvanian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.