| Literature DB >> 28892479 |
Pamela Marie Pennington1,2, José Guillermo Juárez1,3, Margarita Rivera Arrivillaga1, Sandra María De Urioste-Stone4, Katherine Doktor5, Joe P Bryan6,7, Clara Yaseli Escobar8, Celia Cordón-Rosales1.
Abstract
Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease that continues to affect populations living in extreme poverty in Latin America. After successful vector control programs, congenital transmission remains as a challenge to disease elimination. We used the PRECEDE-PROCEED planning model to develop strategies for neonatal screening of congenital Chagas disease in rural communities of Guatemala. These communities have persistent high triatomine infestations and low access to healthcare. We used mixed methods with multiple stakeholders to identify and address maternal-infant health behaviors through semi-structured interviews, participatory group meetings, archival reviews and a cross-sectional survey in high risk communities. From December 2015 to April 2016, we jointly developed a strategy to illustratively advertise newborn screening at the Health Center. The strategy included socioculturally appropriate promotional and educational material, in collaboration with midwives, nurses and nongovernmental organizations. By March 2016, eight of 228 (3.9%) pregnant women had been diagnosed with T. cruzi at the Health Center. Up to this date, no neonatal screening had been performed. By August 2016, seven of eight newborns born to Chagas seropositive women had been parasitologically screened at the Health Center, according to international standards. Thus, we implemented a successful community-based neonatal screening strategy to promote congenital Chagas disease healthcare in a rural setting. The success of the health promotion strategies developed will depend on local access to maternal-infant services, integration with detection of other congenital diseases and reliance on community participation in problem and solution definition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28892479 PMCID: PMC5634652 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Map of study site location.
Comapa municipality and health center location in the department of Jutiapa, Guatemala, relative to Mexico, Honduras, Belize (BZ) and El Salvador (ES). The map was developed using QGis 2.14 with publicly available administrative boundaries.
Chronological project timeline and activities according to PRECEDE-PROCEED phases.
| Month/Year | Phases | Activity | Stakeholder(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| January–June 2011 | (1) Social assessment | Entomological and KAP´s surveys | Community [ |
| September 2012-May 2013 | (1) Social assessment | Participatory action research (PAR) meetings | Community [ |
| October 2013 | (1) Social assessment | Semi-structured interviews and participant observation | Women [ |
| March 2014 | (4) Administrative and policy assessment | Meetings with Jutiapa Health Area and NGO | MoH and NGO |
| October 2014 | (2) Epidemiological assessment | Semi-structured interviews and participant observation | MoH and midwives |
| December 2014 | (3) Educational assessment | Participatory meetings workshops | MoH and midwives |
| December 2014 | (3) Educational assessment | Participant observation and presentation of results | MoH and midwives |
| December 2014-January 2015 | (3) Educational assessment | Participatory meeting workshops to validate and distribute | MoH and midwives |
| April-August 2015 | (3) Ecological assessment | Maternal-infant health access survey | Women 15–44 years of age |
| June 2015 | (4) Administrative and policy assessment | Archival review of registered deliveries | MoH and pregnant women |
| April 2016 | (4) Administrative and policy assessment | Archival review of laboratory diagnostics | MoH and pregnant women |
| December 2015-April 2016 | (5) Intervention design and implementation | Educational material design, validation and stakeholder training | HC, Vector Control, Women´s Municipal Office and World Vision personnel |
| April 2016 | (5) Intervention design and implementation | Educational material distribution | HC, Vector Control and World Vision personnel |
| August 2016 | (5) Intervention design and implementation | Semi-structured interviews, archival review of deliveries and laboratory diagnostics | HC, Vector Control and World Vision community collaborator |
Fig 2Promotional poster “Midwives preventing Chagas”.
The poster was developed through participatory activities with midwives to show the steps to promote congenital Chagas disease screening.
Fig 3Promotional poster titled “Health Center Preventing Chagas”.
The workflow and poster were developed through participatory activities with Health Center personnel to promote screening for early detection of congenital Chagas disease at the HC. The workflow shows two parallel arrows for the same newborn heel prick blood sample. The blood sample for buffy coat separation in capillary tube is taken simultaneously with the blood sample preserved in nucleic acid preservation cards (FTA) for PCR analysis. The arrow connecting the PCR result with the capillary result indicates confirmation of the microscopy, to optimize the parasitological screening method at the Health Center. Children born to positive mothers, but that are not screened within two weeks of birth, should be brought to the Health Center at ten months for antibody rapid test only.
Attention of deliveries inside or outside health services, health centers or hospitals, according to the health access survey of women from 18 communities with persistent T. dimidiata infestation in Comapa, Jutiapa, 2015.
| Health services questions* | No. positive/Total No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Had at least one delivery outside the services of a HC or Hospital of Guatemala | 401/490 (81.8) |
| Last delivery at own household | 391/401 (97.5) |
| Last delivery outside the health services, assisted by a midwife | 335/401 (83.7) |
| Last delivery outside the health services, unassisted | 39/401 (10.0) |
| Last delivery outside the health services, assisted by household relative | 18/401 (4.0) |
| Had at least one delivery in a HC or Hospital of Guatemala | 240/490 (49.0) |
| Had at least one delivery at Comapa HC | 27/240 (11.0) |
| Last delivery at Comapa HC | 23/240 (9.6) |
| Had at least one delivery at Jutiapa Regional Hospital | 192/240 (80.0) |
| Last delivery at Jutiapa Hospital | 176/240 (73.0) |
| Had at least one delivery at another HC or Hospital | 49/240 (20.0) |
| Last delivery at another HC or Hospital | 41/240 (17.0) |
Fig 4Increased childbirths assisted by health services at Comapa´s Health Center over time.
We recorded the number of deliveries within and outside of health services (HS) for children <1 year of age or 1–5 years of age at the time of the health access survey in 2015. Reports were for children born to women living in 18 communities of Comapa with persistent triatomine infestation (n = 490).
Deliveries assisted by registered midwives and MoH personnel according to records from the Comapa Health Center, 2014 and 2015.
| Assisted delivery system | No. reported deliveries in January-December 2014 (%) | No. reported deliveries in January-May 2015 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Registered midwives | 200 (61.2%) | 70 (51.9%) |
| Comapa Health Center | 127 (38.8%) | 65 (48.1%) |
| Total | 327 | 135 |
*Registered midwives served 18 communities in 2014 and 11 communities in 2015. Records of midwife-assisted deliveries are missing for February and August of 2014.
**The health center services 38 communities.
Fig 5Banner used at Comapa´s Health Center maternity ward to promote congenital Chagas disease screening.
An educational flip-chart was developed together with the banner to communicate Chagas disease risk factors, diagnosis and treatment services at the Health Center.