Literature DB >> 28892463

Effect of different velocity loss thresholds during a power-oriented resistance training program on the mechanical capacities of lower-body muscles.

Alejandro Pérez-Castilla1, Amador García-Ramos1,2, Paulino Padial1, Antonio J Morales-Artacho1, Belén Feriche1.   

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two velocity loss thresholds during a power-oriented resistance training program on the mechanical capacities of lower-body muscles. Twenty men were counterbalanced in two groups (VL10 and VL20) based on their maximum power capacity. Both groups used the same exercises, relative intensity and repetition volume, only differing in the velocity loss threshold of each set (VL10: 10% vs. VL20: 20%). Pre- and post-training assessments included an incremental loading test and a 15-m linear sprint to assess the force- and load-velocity relationships and athletic performance variables, respectively. No significant between-group differences (P > 0.05) were observed for the force-velocity relationship parameters (ES range = 0.15-0.42), the MPV attained against different external loads (ES range = 0.02-0.18) or the 15-m sprint time (ES = 0.09). A high between-participants variability was reported for the number of repetitions completed in each training set (CV = 30.3% for VL10 and 29.4% for VL20). These results suggest that both velocity loss thresholds induce similar changes on the lower-body function. The high and variable number of repetitions completed may compromise the velocity-based approach for prescribing and monitoring the repetition volume during a power-oriented resistance training program conducted with the countermovement jump exercise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Force-velocity relationship; countermovement jump; load-velocity relationship; training volume; velocity-based training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28892463     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1376900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  The Acute and Chronic Effects of Implementing Velocity Loss Thresholds During Resistance Training: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Evaluation of the Literature.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Alejandro Pérez Castilla; Amador García Ramos; Bas Van Hooren; Michael R McGuigan; Eric R Helms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Assessment of Back-Squat Performance at Submaximal Loads: Is the Reliability Affected by the Variable, Exercise Technique, or Repetition Criterion?

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Danica Janicijevic; Zeki Akyildiz; Deniz Senturk; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The Bench Press Grip Width Does Not Affect the Number of Repetitions Performed at Different Velocity Loss Thresholds.

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Ivan Jukic; G Gregory Haff; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The effectiveness of traditional vs. velocity-based strength training on explosive and maximal strength performance: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steffen Held; Kevin Speer; Ludwig Rappelt; Pamela Wicker; Lars Donath
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  Velocity-Based Resistance Training on 1-RM, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mateo Baena-Marín; Andrés Rojas-Jaramillo; Jhonatan González-Santamaría; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Jorge L Petro; Richard B Kreider; Diego A Bonilla
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.