Literature DB >> 28892175

(Almost) forgetting to care: an unanticipated source of empathy loss in clerkship.

Cheryl L Holmes1, Harry Miller2,3, Glenn Regehr4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The erosion of empathy in medical students is well documented. Both the hidden curriculum associated with poor role modelling and a sense of burnout have been proposed as key factors, but the precise mechanisms by which this loss of empathy occurs have not been elaborated.
OBJECTIVES: In the context of a course designed to help students manage the hidden curriculum, we collected data that raised questions about current conceptualisations of the aspects of medical training that lead to loss of empathy.
METHODS: We held nine sessions in the first year of clinical clerkship, in which we asked students to bring to the group their experiences of the hidden curriculum for reflection. Course sessions were recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analysed, and themes were generated for further exploration.
RESULTS: We identified an identity developmental trajectory in early clerkship in which students started with feelings of excitement, transitioned quickly to 'shock and awe', progressed into 'survival mode' and then passed into a stage of 'recovery'. Interestingly, in the early stages, students' sense of empathic virtuosity was reinforced. It was not until later, when students were more comfortable in their clinical role, that they reported their tendency to connect with the patient only as an afterthought to the encounter, or not at all, and needed to remind themselves to care.
CONCLUSIONS: We offer new data for consideration with regard to medical students' loss of empathy during early clinical training that suggest it is the process of making patient care routine that shifts the patient from the status of an individual with suffering to the object of the work of being a physician.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28892175     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  8 in total

1.  Third-Year Medical Students' Reactions to Surgical Patients in Pain: Doubt, Distress, and Depersonalization.

Authors:  Kimberly E Kopecky; Tiffany J Zens; Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  The WHO EQUIP Foundational Helping Skills Trainer's Curriculum.

Authors:  Sarah Watts; Jen Hall; Gloria A Pedersen; Katherine Ottman; Kenneth Carswell; Edith Van't Hof; Brandon A Kohrt; Alison Schafer
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Differences and changes in the empathy of Korean medical students according to gender and vocational aptitude, before and after clerkship.

Authors:  Sanghee Yeo
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-29

4.  What impact does postgraduate clinical training have on empathy among Japanese trainee dentists?

Authors:  Toshiko Yoshida; Sho Watanabe; Takayuki Kono; Hiroaki Taketa; Noriko Shiotsu; Hajime Shirai; Yukie Nakai; Yasuhiro Torii
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Empathy Among Orthopaedic Surgery Trainees.

Authors:  Samir Sabharwal; Carol Lin; Joseph K Weistroffer; Dawn M LaPorte
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-09-09

6.  Patient-present teaching in the clinic: Effect on agency and professional behaviour.

Authors:  Bavenjit Cheema; Meredith Li; Daniel Ho; Erica Amari; Heather Buckley; Carolyn Canfield; Cary Cuncic; Laura Nimmon; Anneke Van Enk; Kiran Veerapen; Katherine M Wisener; Cheryl Lynn Holmes
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 7.647

7.  Practical tips for teaching ethics and humanism to medical students.

Authors:  Katharine R Meacham; Ira Sloan; Robyn A Latessa
Journal:  MedEdPublish (2016)       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  Revisiting the trajectory of medical students' empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Freja Allerelli Andersen; Ann-Sofie Bering Johansen; Jens Søndergaard; Christina Maar Andersen; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.