| Literature DB >> 28891955 |
Bogdan Florian Monea1,2, Eusebiu Ilarian Ionete3, Stefan Ionut Spiridon4, Aurel Leca5, Anda Stanciu6, Emil Petre7, Ashok Vaseashta8.
Abstract
We present an investigation consisting of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) based cryogenic temperature sensors, capable of measuring temperatures in the range of 2-77 K. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) due to their extremely small size, superior thermal and electrical properties have suggested that it is possible to create devices that will meet necessary requirements for miniaturization and better performance, by comparison to temperature sensors currently available on the market. Starting from SWCNTs, as starting material, a resistive structure was designed. Employing dropcast method, the carbon nanotubes were deposited over pairs of gold electrodes and in between the structure electrodes from a solution. The procedure was followed by an alignment process between the electrodes using a dielectrophoretic method. Two sensor structures were tested in cryogenic field down to 2 K, and the resistance was measured using a standard four-point method. The measurement results suggest that, at temperatures below 20 K, the temperature coefficient of resistance average for sensor 1 is 1.473%/K and for sensor 2 is 0.365%/K. From the experimental data, it can be concluded that the dependence of electrical resistance versus temperature can be approximated by an exponential equation and, correspondingly, a set of coefficients are calculated. It is further concluded that the proposed approach described here offers several advantages, which can be employed in the fabrication of a microsensors for cryogenic applications.Entities:
Keywords: cryogenic microsensor; electrophoretic alignment; nanoscience; single wall carbon nanotubes; very low temperature measurement
Year: 2017 PMID: 28891955 PMCID: PMC5621383 DOI: 10.3390/s17092071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic view of sensing fabrication unit with gas distribution system.
Figure 2Device under test (DUT)—Four point connection to measure resistance.
Figure 3SEM image of a section of the sensor structure (mag: left: 31 and right: 60 KX).
Figure 4Resistance vs. Temperature (R-T) curves for: Sensor 1 (a); and Sensor 2 (b).
The fitting parameters of the Equation (1) corresponding to the experimental data for Sensor 1 and Sensor 2, respectively.
| Sensor 1 | Sensor 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test 1 | Test 5 | Test 1 | Test 5 | |
| 19,222.98068 | 7.39290915 | 21,950.90322 | 48,419.38356 | |
| 88,043.71776 | 37,752.81212 | 253,217.90828 | 142,239.71845 | |
| 254,698.97717 | 287,769.67141 | 143,146.18497 | 142,310.06541 | |
| 801,570.01493 | 1,555,450 | 17,913,000 | 1,092,000 | |
| 94.79632 | 62.17684 | 26.24794 | 77.20495 | |
| 19.37641 | 7.64496 | 152.14679 | 77.21681 | |
| 6.42804 | 1.49455 | 1.19707 | 8.40832 | |
| 0.99997 | 1 | 0.99291 | 1 | |
Figure 5The difference between experimental results and simulated results for: Sensor 1 (a); and Sensor 2 (b).
Figure 6Temperature coefficient of resistance for: Sensor 1 (a); and Sensor 2 (b).
Figure 7Specific sensitivity for: Sensor 1 (a); and Sensor 2 (b).
Figure 8Absolute temperature resolution of: Sensor 1 (a); and Sensor 2 (b).
Figure 9Resistance vs. Temperature curves for Sensor 1 at a magnetic field B = 0 and 2 T. The inset shows the difference of the resistance measured at B = 0 and 2 T.