Literature DB >> 28891854

Racial and Socioeconomic Differences Manifest in Process Measure Adherence for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway.

Ira L Leeds1, Yewande Alimi, Deborah R Hobson, Jonathan E Efron, Elizabeth C Wick, Elliott R Haut, Fabian M Johnston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to care processes and surgical outcomes varies by population subgroups for the same procedure. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways are intended to standardize care, but their effect on process adherence and outcomes for population subgroups is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate the association between recovery pathway implementation, process measures, and short-term surgical outcomes by population subgroup.
DESIGN: This study is a pre- and post-quality improvement implementation cohort study.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. INTERVENTION: A modified colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery pathway was implemented. PATIENTS: Patients were included who had elective colon and rectal resections before (2013) and following (2014-2016) recovery pathway implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thirty-day outcomes by race and socioeconomic status were analyzed using a difference-in-difference approach with correlation to process adherence.
RESULTS: We identified 639 cases (199 preimplementation, 440 postimplementation). In these cases, 75.2% of the patients were white, and 91.7% had a high socioeconomic status. Groups were similar in terms of other preoperative characteristics. Following pathway implementation, median lengths of stay improved in all subgroups (-1.0 days overall, p ≤ 0.001), but with no statistical difference by race or socioeconomic status (p = 0.89 and p = 0.29). Complication rates in both racial and socioeconomic groups were no different (26.4% vs 28.8%, p = 0.73; 27.3% vs 25.0%, p = 0.86) and remained unchanged with implementation (p = 0.93, p = 0.84). By race, overall adherence was 31.7% in white patients and 26.5% in nonwhite patients (p = 0.32). Although stratification by socioeconomic status demonstrated decreased overall adherence in the low-status group (31.8% vs 17.1%, p = 0.05), white patients were more likely to have regional pain therapy (57.1% vs 44.1%, p = 0.02) with a similar trend seen with socioeconomic status. LIMITATIONS: Data were collected primarily for quality improvement purposes.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in outcomes by race and socioeconomic status did not arise following implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway. Differences in process measures by population subgroups highlight differences in care that require further investigation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A386.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28891854      PMCID: PMC5647878          DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  42 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  What happens to racial and ethnic minorities after cancer surgery at American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals?

Authors:  Helen M Parsons; Elizabeth B Habermann; Steven C Stain; Selwyn M Vickers; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Perioperative Outcomes of Major Procedures: Results From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Praful Ravi; Akshay Sood; Marianne Schmid; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Maxine Sun; Dane E Klett; Briony Varda; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Adam S Kibel; Paul L Nguyen; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Race inequality in epidural use and regional anesthesia failure in labor and birth: an examination of women's experience.

Authors:  Theresa Morris; Mia Schulman
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2014-09-28

5.  Unconscious race and social class bias among acute care surgical clinicians and clinical treatment decisions.

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Eric B Schneider; N Sriram; Deborah S Dossick; Valerie K Scott; Sandra M Swoboda; Lia Losonczy; Elliott R Haut; David T Efron; Peter J Pronovost; Pamela A Lipsett; Edward E Cornwell; Ellen J MacKenzie; Lisa A Cooper; Julie A Freischlag
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Racial disparities in operative outcomes after major cancer surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Shyam Sukumar; Praful Ravi; Akshay Sood; Mai-Kim Gervais; Jim C Hu; Simon P Kim; Mani Menon; Florian Roghmann; Jesse D Sammon; Maxine Sun; Vincent Q Trinh; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system.

Authors:  K L Kahn; W H Rogers; L V Rubenstein; M J Sherwood; E J Reinisch; E B Keeler; D Draper; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.

Authors:  Celia N Robinson; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; David H Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Explaining racial disparities in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Nicholas H Osborne; Gilbert R Upchurch; Amit K Mathur; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Compliance and outcomes of a multicenter study from the Spanish working group on ERAS.

Authors:  Santiago Gonzalez-Ayora; Carlos Pastor; Hector Guadalajara; Jose Manuel Ramirez; Pablo Royo; Elizabeth Redondo; Antonio Arroyo; Pedro Moya; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patients undergoing colorectal surgery at a Veterans Affairs Hospital do not experience racial disparity in length of stay either before or after implementing an enhanced recovery pathway.

Authors:  C Rentas; S Baker; L Goss; J Richman; S J Knight; C Key; M Morris
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.030

2.  Psychosocial Risks are Independently Associated with Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Medically Comorbid Patients.

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Patrick M Meyers; Zachary O Enumah; Jin He; Richard A Burkhart; Elliott R Haut; Jonathan E Efron; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The Impact of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Clinical Outcomes for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at a High-volume Cancer Center: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin D Powers; William Fulp; Amina Dhahri; Danielle K DePeralta; Takuya Ogami; Luke Rothermel; Jennifer B Permuth; Susan T Vadaparampil; Joon-Kyung Kim; Jose Pimiento; Pamela J Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Daniel A Anaya; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 13.787

4.  Race, ethnicity, and the use of regional anesthesia in cancer patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pascal Owusu-Agyemang; Lei Feng; Vivian H Porche; Uduak U Williams; Juan P Cata
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.