| Literature DB >> 28891751 |
Vanessa Harris1,2, Asad Ali3, Susana Fuentes3, Katri Korpela4,5, Momin Kazi3, Jacqueline Tate6, Umesh Parashar6, W Joost Wiersinga2, Carlo Giaquinto7, Carolina de Weerth8, Willem M de Vos4,5.
Abstract
Rotavirus (RV) is the leading cause of diarrhea-related death in children worldwide and ninety-five percent of rotavirus deaths occur in Africa and Asia. Rotavirus vaccines (RVV) can dramatically reduce RV deaths, but have low efficacy in low-income settings where they are most needed. The intestinal microbiome may contribute to this decreased RVV efficacy. This pilot study hypothesizes that infants' intestinal microbiota composition correlates with RVV immune responses and that RVV responders have different gut microbiota as compared to non-responders. We conducted a nested, matched case-control study comparing the pre-vaccination intestinal microbiota composition between 10 6-week old Pakistani RVV-responders, 10 6-week old Pakistani RVV non-responders, and 10 healthy Dutch infants. RVV response was defined as an Immunoglobulin A of ≥20 IU/mL following Rotarix™(RV1) vaccination in an infant with a pre-vaccination IgA<20. Infants were matched in a 1:1 ratio using ranked variables: RV1 dosing schedule (6/10/14; 6/10; or 10/14 weeks), RV season, delivery mode, delivery place, breastfeeding practices, age and gender. Fecal microbiota analysis was performed using a highly reproducible phylogenetic microarray. RV1 response correlated with a higher relative abundance of bacteria belonging to Clostridium cluster XI and Proteobacteria, including bacteria related to Serratia and Escherichia coli. Remarkably, abundance of these Proteobacteria was also significantly higher in Dutch infants when compared to RV1-non-responders in Pakistan. This small but carefully matched study showed the intestinal microbiota composition to correlate with RV1 seroconversion in Pakistan infants, identifying signatures shared with healthy Dutch infants.Entities:
Keywords: intestinal microbes; rotavirus vaccine; seroconversion; vaccine immunogenicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28891751 PMCID: PMC5989807 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1376162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Microbes ISSN: 1949-0976
Baseline characteristics RV1 Non-responders and Responders.
| RV1 Non-responders | RV1 Responders | p-value | Dutch infants | p-values (NL-NR; NL-R) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10/66 (15%) | 10/66 (15%) | NA | 10 | NA |
| Gender | 0.65 | ||||
| Male | 6/10 (60%) | 5/10 (50%) | 6/10 | 1.0; 0.65 | |
| Female | 4/10 (40%) | 5/10 (40%) | 4/10 | ||
| RV1 dosing | 0.82 | ||||
| 6/10 wks | 1/10 (10%) | 2/10 (20%) | NA | ||
| 10/14 wks | 1/10 (10%) | 1/10 (10%) | |||
| 6/10/14 wks | 8/10 (80%) | 7/10 (70%) | |||
| Rotavirus Season | 1.000 | NA | |||
| Yes | 4/10 (40%) | 4/10 (40%) | |||
| No | 6/10 (60%) | 6/10 (60%) | |||
| Location of delivery | 0.64 | ||||
| Home | 4/10 (40%) | 3/10 (30%) | 4/10 | 1.0; 0.64 | |
| Healthcare | 6/10 (60%) | 7/10 (70%) | 6/10 | ||
| Mode of delivery | 1.00 | ||||
| Vaginal | 9/10 (90%) | 9/10 (90%) | 10/10 | 0.29; 0.29 | |
| C-section | 1/10 (10%) | 1/10 (10%) | 0/10 | ||
| Feeding | 1.00 | ||||
| Breastfeeding | 9/10 (90%) | 9/10 (90%) | 7/10 | 0.35; 0.35 | |
| BF + Formula | 1/10 (10%) | 1/10 (10%) | 2/10 | ||
| Formula | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | 1/10 | ||
| Malnutrition | |||||
| (Z score<−2) | |||||
| Length-for-age | 1/10 (10%) | 1/10 (10%) | 1.00 | 0/10 | 0.22; 0.22 |
| Weight-for-length | 1/10 (10%) | 1/10 (10%) | 0/10 | ||
| Weight-for-age | 1/10 (10%) | 1/10 (10%) | 0/10 |
Note. Baseline characteristics of the infants enrolled in the nested study and differences between the Pakistani RV1 non-responders and responders as determined by the Chi-square test. Baseline characteristics of the matched Dutch infants and differences between Dutch and Pakistani RV1 non-responders and responders, respectively as determined by the Chi-square test. Abbreviations: RV1, Rotavirus vaccine; NL, Dutch infants.
Figure 1.Distribution of the relative abundance of bacteria between Pakistani responders and non-responders. The relative abundance (%) for all phyla (class for Firmicutes) (1A), significantly different phyla (p < 0.05) (1B), and significantly different bacteria at the genus-like level (FDR < 0.5) (1C) are illustrated. Bean plots compare Pakistani responders (1, orange) and non-responders (0, red). The horizontal black line is the median and the height of each bean plot illustrates the distribution of the values for abundance within each group.
Figure 2.Phylogenetic Heat Tree illustrates the differences in relative bacterial abundance between Pakistani non-responders and responder infants. Colored blue are bacteria where a lower abundance associates with RVV response and colored red are bacterial groups where a higher abundance correlates with RVV response.
Figure 3.Phylogenetic Heat Tree illustrates the differences in relative bacterial abundance between all Pakistani non-responder, Pakistani responder and Dutch infants when indexed by response. Each group's RVV response is indexed (Pakistani non-responder 1, responder 2, and Dutch infants 3) and those bacteria with significant linear associations with index are colored. Colored blue are bacteria where a lower abundance associates with RVV response and colored red are bacterial groups where a higher abundance correlates with RVV response.