Literature DB >> 28891046

The association of postoperative pulmonary complications in 109,360 patients with pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation.

A Bagchi1, M I Rudolph1, P Y Ng1, F P Timm1, D R Long1, S Shaefi2, K Ladha3, M F Vidal Melo1, M Eikermann2,4.   

Abstract

We thought that the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications might be higher after pressure-controlled ventilation than after volume-controlled ventilation. We analysed peri-operative data recorded for 109,360 adults, whose lungs were mechanically ventilated during surgery at three hospitals in Massachusetts, USA. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching. Postoperative pulmonary complications were more common after pressure-controlled ventilation, odds ratio (95%CI) 1.29 (1.21-1.37), p < 0.001. Tidal volumes and driving pressures were more varied with pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation: mean (SD) variance from the median 1.61 (1.36) ml.kg-1 vs. 1.23 (1.11) ml.kg-1 , p < 0.001; and 3.91 (3.47) cmH2 O vs. 3.40 (2.69) cmH2 O, p < 0.001. The odds ratio (95%CI) of pulmonary complications after pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation at positive end-expiratory pressures < 5 cmH2 O was 1.40 (1.26-1.55) and 1.20 (1.11-1.31) when ≥ 5 cmH2 O, both p < 0.001, a relative risk ratio of 1.17 (1.03-1.33), p = 0.023. The odds ratio (95%CI) of pulmonary complications after pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation at driving pressures of < 19 cmH2 O was 1.37 (1.27-1.48), p < 0.001, and 1.16 (1.04-1.30) when ≥ 19 cmH2 O, p = 0.011, a relative risk ratio of 1.18 (1.07-1.30), p = 0.016. Our data support volume-controlled ventilation during surgery, particularly for patients more likely to suffer postoperative pulmonary complications.
© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung protection ventilation: pressure goal; pressure-controlled ventilation; volume-controlled ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28891046      PMCID: PMC6696935          DOI: 10.1111/anae.14039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  40 in total

1.  Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.

Authors:  Stef van Buuren
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment.

Authors:  C-C Balick-Weber; P Nicolas; M Hedreville-Montout; P Blanchet; F Stéphan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  P Cadi; T Guenoun; D Journois; J-M Chevallier; J-L Diehl; D Safran
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  A M Arozullah; S F Khuri; W G Henderson; J Daley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Factors associated with and consequences of unplanned post-operative intubation in elderly vascular and general surgery patients.

Authors:  Olubukola O Nafiu; Satya K Ramachandran; Ray Ackwerh; Kevin K Tremper; Darrell A Campbell; James C Stanley
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Prospective randomized trial comparing pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in ARDS. For the Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group.

Authors:  A Esteban; I Alía; F Gordo; R de Pablo; J Suarez; G González; J Blanco
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Mustafa Oğurlu; Mert Küçük; Ferruh Bilgin; Ali Sizlan; Omer Yanarateş; Sami Eksert; Emre Karaşahin; Ahmet Coşar
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Leigh Neumayer; Karl Hammermeister; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy Healey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Regional gas exchange and cellular metabolic activity in ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Guido Musch; Jose G Venegas; Giacomo Bellani; Tilo Winkler; Tobias Schroeder; Bodil Petersen; R Scott Harris; Marcos F Vidal Melo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Should we titrate ventilation based on driving pressure? Maybe not in the way we would expect.

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Lorenzo Ball
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Respiratory mechanics during general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ball; Federico Costantino; Martina Fiorito; Sara Amodio; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

3.  Ventilatory frequency during intraoperative mechanical ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications: a hospital registry study.

Authors:  Peter Santer; Shengxing Zheng; Maximilian Hammer; Sarah Nabel; Ameeka Pannu; Yunping Li; Satya Krishna Ramachandran; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Perioperative lung protective ventilation.

Authors:  Brian O'Gara; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-10

5.  Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode Combined with an Open-Lung Approach Improves Lung Mechanics, Oxygenation Parameters, and the Inflammatory Response during One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jianli Li; Baogui Cai; Dongdong Yu; Meinv Liu; Xiaoqian Wu; Junfang Rong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  How I ventilate an obese patient.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ball; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Perioperative anaesthetic management of patients with or at risk of acute distress respiratory syndrome undergoing emergency surgery.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Chiara Robba; Patricia Rieken Macêdo Rocco; Marcelo Gama De Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Lorenzo Ball
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Lung ultrasound score-based perioperative assessment of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed or volume-controlled ventilation in geriatrics: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Young Sung Kim; Young Ju Won; Dong Kyu Lee; Byung Gun Lim; Heezoo Kim; Il Ok Lee; Jin Hee Yun; Myoung Hoon Kong
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Comparison of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sangbong Choi; So Young Yang; Geun Joo Choi; Beom Gyu Kim; Hyun Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  AutoFlow® versus volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery using LMA® ProSeal™: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakanishi; Seishi Sakamoto; Manabu Yoshimura; Takashi Toriumi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.