Audrey S Kulaylat1, Katelin A Mirkin1, Christopher S Hollenbeak1,2, Joyce Wong1. 1. Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, State College, PA, USA. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, State College, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy, with most patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative therapies comprise an important, but underutilized, aspect of care. This aim of this study was to characterize the trends, factors, and outcomes associated with utilization of palliative therapies. METHODS: Patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma from the 2003-2011 U.S. National Cancer Database were identified and stratified by receipt of palliative therapy. Linear regression, multivariable logistic regression, and survival analyses using multivariate proportional hazards models were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight thousand and seventy-five patients with stage IV disease were identified, of which only 11,449 (16.8%) underwent designated palliative therapy. The majority received systemic chemotherapy (37.2%), followed by surgery (19.0%), pain management alone (15.3%), radiation (8.1%), referral alone (11.7%), or a combination thereof (8.7%). Utilization of palliative therapies increased from 12.9% in 2003 to 19.2% in 2011 (P<0.001). Patients were less likely to undergo palliation when older than 60 (OR 0.89, P<0.001), or of black or Hispanic race (OR 0.83, P<0.001; OR 0.80, P<0.001, respectively, vs. Caucasians). Presence of comorbidities increased the use of palliative therapy (OR 1.16 per comorbidity, P<0.001). Survival was improved in those receiving palliative systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.55, P<0.001) and palliative surgery (HR 0.94, P<0.001), although this may be due to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the continued dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer, palliation of symptoms remains underutilized in this country, particularly in non-Caucasian, older patients. Increased awareness of palliative options may help increase its utilization.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy, with most patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative therapies comprise an important, but underutilized, aspect of care. This aim of this study was to characterize the trends, factors, and outcomes associated with utilization of palliative therapies. METHODS:Patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma from the 2003-2011 U.S. National Cancer Database were identified and stratified by receipt of palliative therapy. Linear regression, multivariable logistic regression, and survival analyses using multivariate proportional hazards models were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight thousand and seventy-five patients with stage IV disease were identified, of which only 11,449 (16.8%) underwent designated palliative therapy. The majority received systemic chemotherapy (37.2%), followed by surgery (19.0%), pain management alone (15.3%), radiation (8.1%), referral alone (11.7%), or a combination thereof (8.7%). Utilization of palliative therapies increased from 12.9% in 2003 to 19.2% in 2011 (P<0.001). Patients were less likely to undergo palliation when older than 60 (OR 0.89, P<0.001), or of black or Hispanic race (OR 0.83, P<0.001; OR 0.80, P<0.001, respectively, vs. Caucasians). Presence of comorbidities increased the use of palliative therapy (OR 1.16 per comorbidity, P<0.001). Survival was improved in those receiving palliative systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.55, P<0.001) and palliative surgery (HR 0.94, P<0.001), although this may be due to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the continued dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer, palliation of symptoms remains underutilized in this country, particularly in non-Caucasian, older patients. Increased awareness of palliative options may help increase its utilization.
Entities:
Keywords:
National Cancer Database; Palliative therapy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Authors: A Kristensen; O M Vagnildhaug; B H Grønberg; S Kaasa; B Laird; T S Solheim Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nienke Bernards; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Geert-Jan Creemers; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Valery E P P Lemmens Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Jens Werner; Stephanie E Combs; Christoph Springfeld; Werner Hartwig; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: S J E Rombouts; J A Vogel; H C van Santvoort; K P van Lienden; R van Hillegersberg; O R C Busch; M G H Besselink; I Q Molenaar Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Daniel de la Iglesia; Bartu Avci; Mariia Kiriukova; Nikola Panic; Maryana Bozhychko; Vasile Sandru; Enrique de-Madaria; Gabriele Capurso Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Danielle R Heller; Raymond A Jean; Alexander S Chiu; Shelli I Feder; Vadim Kurbatov; Charles Cha; Sajid A Khan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Annabelle L Fonseca; Hamza Khan; Krista R Mehari; Deepa Cherla; Martin J Heslin; Fabian M Johnston Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-23 Impact factor: 5.344