Literature DB >> 28890084

Contingent engagement: What we learn from patients with complex health problems and low socioeconomic status.

Miriam Komaromy1, Erin Fanning Madden2, Andrea Zurawski3, Summers Kalishman4, Kristin Barker5, Patricia O'Sullivan6, Martin Jurado3, Sanjeev Arora7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Elicit patients' perceptions of factors that facilitate their engagement in care
METHODS: In-depth interviews with 20 adult Medicaid patients who had complex health problems, frequent hospitalizations/emergency department use, and who were enrolled in an intensive, team-based care program designed to address medical, behavioral, and social needs.
RESULTS: Prior to engaging in the program, participants described weak relationships with primary care providers, frequent hospitalizations and emergency visits, poor adherence to medications and severe social barriers to care. After participating in the program, participants identified key factors that enabled them to develop trust and engage with care including: availability for extended intensive interactions, a non-judgmental approach, addressing patients' material needs, and providing social contact for isolated patients. After developing relationships with their care team, participants described changes such as sustained interactions with their primary care team and incremental improvements in health behaviors.
CONCLUSION: These findings illuminate factors promoting "contingent engagement" for low socio-economic status patients with complex health problems, which allow them to become proactive in ways commensurate with their circumstances, and offers insights for designing interventions to improve patient outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: For these patients, engagement is contingent on healthcare providers' efforts to develop trust and address patients' material needs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex care; Contingent engagement; ECHO model; Hospitalization; Medicaid; Patient engagement; Primary healthcare; Socioeconomic status; Team based care; Traditionally underserved

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890084     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  3 in total

1.  Defining case management success: a qualitative study of case manager perspectives from a large-scale health and social needs support program.

Authors:  Margae Knox; Emily E Esteban; Elizabeth A Hernandez; Mark D Fleming; Nadia Safaeinilli; Amanda L Brewster
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-06

2.  A Novel Intervention for High-Need, High-Cost Medicaid Patients: a Study of ECHO Care.

Authors:  Miriam Komaromy; Judy Bartlett; Sarah R Gonzales-van Horn; Andrea Zurawski; Summers G Kalishman; Yiliang Zhu; Herbert T Davis; Venice Ceballos; Xi Sun; Martin Jurado; Kimberly Page; Allison Hamblin; Sanjeev Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Access to midwifery care for people of low socio-economic status: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Darling; Lindsay Grenier; Lisa Nussey; Beth Murray-Davis; Eileen K Hutton; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.