Literature DB >> 28889920

The incidence of unsuccessful partial nephrectomy within the United States: A nationwide population-based analysis from 2003 to 2015.

Yash S Khandwala1, In Gab Jeong2, Jae Heon Kim3, Deok Hyun Han3, Shufeng Li4, Ye Wang5, Steven L Chang6, Benjamin I Chung3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy (PN) remains underutilized within the United States and few reports have attempted to explain this trend. The aim of this study is to evaluate the nationwide incidence of unsuccessful PN and factors that predict its occurrence.
METHODS: Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we retrospectively analyzed a weighted sample of 66,432 patients undergoing curative surgery for renal mass between 2003 and 2015. PN intent was denoted by presence of insurance claims for the administration of mannitol. Unsuccessful PN was defined as an event in which patients were administered mannitol but received radical nephrectomy. A multivariate logistic regression model was generated to identify factors predicting unsuccessful PN.
RESULTS: Overall rates of unsuccessful PN declined from 33.5% to 14.5% since 2003. Conversion to radical nephrectomy occurred most frequently during laparoscopic (34.7%) and least frequently during robotic approach (13.6%). There was significant difference in the rate of unsuccessful PN between very high and very low volume surgeons (open: 39.4% vs. 13.3%, laparoscopic: 51.2% vs. 32.2%, and robot assisted: 27.1% vs. 9.4%, all P<0.001). After adjustment for patient- and hospital-related factors, surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open, odds ratio = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.31-2.30, P<0.001) and annual surgeon volume (very high vs. very low, odds ratio = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21-0.34 P<0.001) were associated with unsuccessful PN.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of unsuccessful PN appears to be declining, it still remains common for low volume surgeons and with the laparoscopic surgical approach. Further evaluation of its effect on health care outcomes is necessary.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion to open surgery; Laparoscopy; Mannitol; Nephrectomy; Robotic surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28889920     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  6 in total

1.  The use of nephrometry scoring systems can help urologists predict the risk of conversion to radical nephrectomy in patients scheduled for partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Marta Rossanese; Gianluca Giannarini; Alessandro Crestani; Alchiede Simonato; Antonino Inferrera
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Are nephrometry scores enough to select patients really fit for nephron sparing surgery?

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Daniele Amparore; Angela Pecoraro; Enrico Checcucci
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Association of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs, 2003 to 2015.

Authors:  In Gab Jeong; Yash S Khandwala; Jae Heon Kim; Deok Hyun Han; Shufeng Li; Ye Wang; Steven L Chang; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A Larger Prospective Study is Needed When Judging Robotic Radical Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Giovanni E Cacciamani; Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 24.267

Review 5.  Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Akbar N Ashrafi; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

Review 6.  Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay.

Authors:  Angus Chin On Luk; Rajadoss Muthu Krishna Pandian; Rakesh Heer
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.