| Literature DB >> 28889869 |
F Jeane Gerard1, Rebecca L Crookes2, Susan Elliott3, Michael Hellenbach3, Athanasios Stamos3, Helen Poole4, Erica Bowen5.
Abstract
The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.Entities:
Keywords: Ballistic evidence sharing; Cross-border comparison; European ballistic database; Firearm; Open case file
Year: 2017 PMID: 28889869 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.04.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Justice ISSN: 1355-0306 Impact factor: 2.124