Literature DB >> 28889330

Desarda's technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

S H Emile1, H Elfeki2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Lichtenstein technique (LT) has been recognized as the standard treatment for inguinal hernia in adults owing to the high recurrence rates of tissue-based repairs. However, Desarda technique (DT) appeared as promising tissue-based repair that provided low incidence of recurrence without the need for implanting prosthetic or foreign materials in the inguinal canal. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DT and LT for primary inguinal hernia in adults aimed to determine which technique had better clinical outcome regarding recurrence and complication rates.
METHODS: A systematic literature search for RCTs comparing between DT and LT was conducted using electronic databases and Google scholar service. Patients' characteristics, technical details, recurrence and complication rates, and time to resume daily activities were extracted from the original studies and analyzed.
RESULTS: Six RCTs comprising 2159 patients (89% males) were included. No significant difference in the incidence of recurrence between both techniques was detected (OR = 0.946; P = 0.91). The overall complication rate of LT was significantly higher than DT (OR = 1.86; P < 0.001). LT had significantly higher rates of seroma formation and surgical site infection (OR = 2.17; P = 0.007) and (OR = 2.17; P = 0.029), respectively. Postoperative pain, operation time, and time to resume normal activities were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Both DT and LT provided satisfactory treatment for primary inguinal hernia with low recurrence rates and acceptable rates of complications that were significantly less after DT. More well-designed RCTs with longer follow-up are required for further validation of the DT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Desarda; Inguinal hernia; Lichtenstein; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial; Review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28889330     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1666-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  41 in total

1.  Groin pain after hernia repair.

Authors:  R E Condon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles.

Authors:  Parviz K Amid
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Samir S Awad; Shawn P Fagan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  B de Goede; P J Klitsie; B J H van Kempen; L Timmermans; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; J F Lange
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Sexual function and testicular perfusion after inguinal hernia repair with mesh.

Authors:  J Zieren; D Beyersdorff; K M Beier; J M Müller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.

Authors:  K McCormack; B Wake; J Perez; C Fraser; J Cook; E McIntosh; L Vale; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Authors:  N W Scott; K McCormack; P Graham; P M Go; S J Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comment to: Desarda's technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Emile SH, Elfeki H.

Authors:  J Li; W Zhang
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Use of the Desarda Technique in Emergency Settings: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Danilo Coco; Silvana Leanza; Giuseppe Angelo Reina
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

Review 3.  Is Desarda technique suitable to emergency inguinal hernia surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdourahmane Ndong; Jacques Noel Tendeng; Adja Coumba Diallo; Mohamed Lamine Diao; Saer Diop; Diago Anta Dia; Philippe Manyacka Ma Nyemb; Ibrahima Konaté
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.