Literature DB >> 28888812

Use of automated chest compression devices after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden.

Simon Schmidbauer1, Johan Herlitz2, Thomas Karlsson3, Christer Axelsson4, Hans Friberg5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of automated chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACC-CPR) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Sweden during the years 2011 through 2015. The association between ACC-CPR and 30-day survival was studied as a secondary objective.
METHODS: The Swedish cardiopulmonary resuscitation registry is a prospectively recorded nationwide registry of modified Utstein parameters including all patients with attempted resuscitation after OHCA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for known confounders in the secondary analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 24,316 patients included in the study population, 32.4% received ACC-CPR, with substantial regional variation ranging from 0.8% to 78.8%. Male gender and an initial shockable rhythm were associated with ACC-CPR, whereas crew witnessed status was associated with manual CPR. Potential markers of prolonged resuscitation attempts (drug administration and endotracheal intubation) were more prevalent in the ACC-CPR group. The unadjusted 30-day survival rate was 6.3% for ACC-CPR patients. The adjusted odds ratio for 30-day survival regarding use of an ACC device was 0.72 (95% CI 0.62-0.84, p<0.001, n=13922).
CONCLUSION: The use of ACC devices varied significantly between Swedish regions and overall survival to 30days was low among patients receiving ACC-CPR. Although measured and unmeasured confounding might explain our finding of lower survival rates for patients exposed to ACC-CPR, specific guidelines recommending when and how ACC-CPR should be used are warranted as there might be circumstances where these devices do more harm than good.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated chest compression devices; Mechanical chest compression devices; Mechanical compressions; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28888812     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  4 in total

1.  Mechanical chest compression devices in the helicopter emergency medical service in Switzerland.

Authors:  Urs Pietsch; David Reiser; Volker Wenzel; Jürgen Knapp; Mario Tissi; Lorenz Theiler; Simon Rauch; Lorenz Meuli; Roland Albrecht
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Metrics of mechanical chest compression device use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Michael Levy; Karl B Kern; Dana Yost; Fred W Chapman; Bjarne Madsen Hardig
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-07-04

3.  Outcomes and interventions in patients transported to hospital with ongoing CPR after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - An observational study.

Authors:  S Schmidbauer; E J Yates; C Andréll; D Bergström; H Olson; G D Perkins; H Friberg
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-10-16

Review 4.  Comparison between Prehospital Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Devices and Manual CPR for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Ying Chiang; Ket-Cheong Lim; Pei Chun Lai; Tou-Yuan Tsai; Yen Ta Huang; Ming-Jen Tsai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.