Literature DB >> 28888729

Easy-going, rational, susceptible and struggling eaters: A segmentation study based on eating behaviour tendencies.

Saara Pentikäinen1, Anne Arvola2, Leila Karhunen3, Kyösti Pennanen4.   

Abstract

Eating behaviour tendencies, emotional eating (EE), uncontrolled eating (UE) and cognitive restraint (CR), are associated with various indicators of physical and mental health. Therefore, it is important to understand these tendencies in order to design interventions to improve health. Previous research has mostly examined eating behaviour tendencies individually, without considering typical combinations of these tendencies or their manifestation in well-being and food choices. This study aimed to understand the interactive occurrence of EE, UE and CR in two independent populations. Finnish (n = 1060) and German (n = 1070) samples were segmented on the basis of their responses to a modified Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R15). Well-being, coping strategies and food consumption habits of the segments were studied. Segmentation revealed four segments: "Susceptible", "Easy-going", "Rational" and "Struggling". These segments were similar in both countries with regard to well-being, coping strategies and food choices. EE and UE co-occurred, and these tendencies were mainly responsible for differentiating the segments. Members of the "Rational" and "Easy-going" segments, who had low scores for EE and UE, tended to experience vitality and positive emotions in life, and contentment with their eating. By contrast, the "Susceptible" and "Struggling" segments, with more pronounced tendencies towards EE and UE, experienced lower levels of vitality and less frequently positive emotions, applied less adaptive coping strategies and experienced more discontent with eating. The results of the current study suggest that it is possible to identify segments, with differing eating habits, coping strategies and well-being on the basis of the eating behaviour tendencies EE, UE and CR. We discuss possible viewpoints for the design of interventions and food products to help people towards psychologically and physiologically healthier eating styles.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive restraint; Coping; Eating behaviour tendency; Eating style; Emotional eating; Emotions; Food choice; Segmentation; Three-factor eating questionnaire; Uncontrolled eating; Vitality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28888729     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  5 in total

1.  Emotional Eating and Dietary Patterns: Reflecting Food Choices in People with and without Abdominal Obesity.

Authors:  Alejandra Betancourt-Núñez; Nathaly Torres-Castillo; Erika Martínez-López; César O De Loera-Rodríguez; Elvira Durán-Barajas; Fabiola Márquez-Sandoval; María Fernanda Bernal-Orozco; Marta Garaulet; Barbara Vizmanos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Mobile Phone App for Self-Monitoring of Eating Rhythm: Field Experiment.

Authors:  Saara Pentikäinen; Hannu Tanner; Leila Karhunen; Marjukka Kolehmainen; Kaisa Poutanen; Kyösti Pennanen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Relationships Among Dietary Cognitive Restraint, Food Preferences, and Reaction Times.

Authors:  Travis D Masterson; John Brand; Michael R Lowe; Stephen A Metcalf; Ian W Eisenberg; Jennifer A Emond; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-09

4.  Psycho-Behavioural Segmentation in Food and Nutrition: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Eva L Jenkins; Samara Legrand; Linda Brennan; Annika Molenaar; Mike Reid; Tracy A McCaffrey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Sleep-time physiological recovery is associated with eating habits in distressed working-age Finns with overweight: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Elina Järvelä-Reijonen; Suvi Järvinen; Marjukka Kolehmainen; Jaana Laitinen; Leila Karhunen; Tiina Föhr; Tero Myllymäki; Essi Sairanen; Sanni Lindroos; Katri Peuhkuri; Maarit Hallikainen; Jussi Pihlajamäki; Sampsa Puttonen; Riitta Korpela; Miikka Ermes; Raimo Lappalainen; Urho M Kujala
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.646

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.