Literature DB >> 28887425

To what extent and why adolescents do or do not support future tobacco control measures: a multimethod study in the Netherlands.

Michael Schreuders1, Naomi A Lagerweij1, Bas van den Putte2,3, Anton E Kunst1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, the adoption of new tobacco control measures is needed to further reduce rates of adolescent smoking. Adolescents' support for future measures could increase the likelihood of adoption as this provides political leverage for tobacco control advocates. There is, however, scant evidence about to what extent and why adolescents support future measures. We therefore assessed adolescents' support for a range of future measures and explored the criteria that adolescents use to underpin their support.
METHODS: A mixed-method design involved surveys and group interviews with fourth-year students (predominantly 15-16 years). The survey, completed by 345 adolescents, included statements about future tobacco control measures and a smoke-free future where nobody starts or continues smoking. Thereafter, 15 adolescents participated in five group interviews to discuss their support for future measures.
RESULTS: The survey showed that adolescents generally support a smoke-free future. They expressed most support for product measures, mixed support for smoke-free areas, ambivalent support for price increases and least support for sales restrictions. The group interviews revealed that differences in support were explained by adolescents' criteria that future measures should: have the potential to be effective, not violate individuals' right to smoke, protect children from pro-smoking social influences and protect non-smokers from secondhand smoke.
CONCLUSION: Adolescents' high support for a smoke-free future does not lead to categorical support for any measure. Addressing the underlying criteria may increase adolescents' support and therewith provide political leverage for the adoption of future measures. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  end-game; prevention; public opinion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887425     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  9 in total

1.  Adolescents' support for an outdoor smoke-free policy at sports clubs in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Heike H Garritsen; Rein R Distelvelt; Ingri G Olsen; Ien A M van de Goor; Anton E Kunst; Andrea D Rozema
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2021-05-27

2.  Adolescent Smoking in Secondary Schools that Have Implemented Smoke-Free Policies: In-Depth Exploration of Shared Smoking Patterns.

Authors:  Michael Schreuders; Loekie Klompmaker; Bas van den Putte; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Understanding school staff members' enforcement of school tobacco policies to achieve tobacco-free school: a realist review.

Authors:  Anu Linnansaari; Michael Schreuders; Anton E Kunst; Arja Rimpelä; Pirjo Lindfors
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-19

4.  The scope of tobacco cessation randomized controlled trials in low- to middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Navin Kumar; Jessica Ainooson; Ameera Billings; Grace Chen; Lauren Cueto; Kamila Janmohamed; Jeannette Jiang; Raymond Niaura; Amy Zhang
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-21

5.  The Association Between Smoke-Free School Policies and Adolescents' Perceived Antismoking Norms: Moderation by School Connectedness.

Authors:  Michael Schreuders; Bas van den Putte; Martin Mlinarić; Nora Mélard; Julian Perelman; Matthias Richter; Arja Rimpela; Mirte A G Kuipers; Vincent Lorant; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 6.  Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.

Authors:  Eloise Howse; Katherine Cullerton; Anne Grunseit; Erika Bohn-Goldbaum; Adrian Bauman; Becky Freeman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-03-04

7.  Exposure to Tobacco Smoking in Vehicles, Indoor, and Outdoor Settings in Germany: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Authors:  Martin Mlinarić; Sabrina Kastaun; Daniel Kotz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Why staff at European schools abstain from enforcing smoke-free policies on persistent violators.

Authors:  Michael Schreuders; Anu Linnansaari; Pirjo Lindfors; Bas van den Putte; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  Pediatric patients' views regarding smoke-free hospital grounds compared to those of adults: A survey study.

Authors:  Leonieke J Breunis; Maud Versteylen; Márta K Radó; Nazmi Dereci; Nienke W Boderie; Marlou L A de Kroon; Jasper V Been
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2022-02-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.