Literature DB >> 28887296

An Exploration of Changes in the Measurement of Mammography in the National Health Interview Survey.

Felisa A Gonzales1, Gordon B Willis2, Nancy Breen3, Ting Yan4, Kathy A Cronin2, Stephen H Taplin2, Mandi Yu2.   

Abstract

Background: Using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we examined the effect of question wording on estimates of past-year mammography among racially/ethnically diverse women ages 40-49 and 50-74 without a history of breast cancer.
Methods: Data from one-part ("Have you had a mammogram during the past 12 months?") and two-part ("Have you ever had a mammogram"; "When did you have your most recent mammogram?") mammography history questions administered in the 2008, 2011, and 2013 NHIS were analyzed. χ2 tests provided estimates of changes in mammography when question wording was either the same (two-part question) or differed (two-part question followed by one-part question) in the two survey years compared. Crosstabulations and regression models assessed the type, extent, and correlates of inconsistent responses to the two questions in 2013.
Results: Reports of past-year mammography were slightly higher in years when the one-part question was asked than when the two-part question was asked. Nearly 10% of women provided inconsistent responses to the two questions asked in 2013. Black women ages 50 to 74 [adjusted OR (aOR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-1.93] and women ages 40-49 in poor health (aOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.09-4.52) had higher odds of inconsistent responses; women without a usual source of care had lower odds (40-49: aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85; 50-74: aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.74).Conclusions: Self-reports of mammography are sensitive to question wording. Researchers should use equivalent questions that have been designed to minimize response biases such as telescoping and social desirability.Impact: Trend analyses relying on differently worded questions may be misleading and conceal disparities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(11); 1611-8. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887296     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Prevalence and Adherence for the Cancer Prevention Project of Philadelphia (CAP3) Participants Who Self-Identify as Black.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Blackman; Camille Ragin; Resa M Jones
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Lack of validity of self-reported mammography data.

Authors:  Robert S Levine; Barbara J Kilbourne; Maureen Sanderson; Mary K Fadden; Maria Pisu; Jason L Salemi; Maria Carmenza Mejia de Grubb; Heather O'Hara; Baqar A Husaini; Roget J Zoorob; Charles H Hennekens
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2019-01-29

3.  Three large scale surveys highlight the complexity of cervical cancer under-screening among women 45-65years of age in the United States.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Melissa Plegue; Kathryn M Harmes; Masahito Jimbo; Sherri SheinfeldGorin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Factors associated with mammography use: A side-by-side comparison of results from two national surveys.

Authors:  Lihua Li; Jiayi Ji; Melanie Besculides; Nina Bickell; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf; Emanuela Taioli; Madhu Mazumdar; Bian Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.