Literature DB >> 28887208

Proteomic comparison of three clinical diarrhoeagenic drug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates grown on CHROMagar™STEC media.

John Bosco Kalule1, Suereta Fortuin2, Bridget Calder2, Lourens Robberts1, Karen H Keddy3, Andrew J M Nel2, Shaun Garnett2, Mark Nicol4, Digby F Warner5, Nelson C Soares6, Jonathan M Blackburn7.   

Abstract

Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) are key diarrhoea-causing foodborne pathogens. We used proteomics to characterize the virulence and antimicrobial resistance protein profiles of three clinical pathogenic E. coli isolates (two EPEC [one resistant to ciprofloxacin] and one STEC) cultured on CHROMagar™STEC solid media after minimal laboratory passage. We identified 4767 unique peptides from 1630 protein group across all three clinical E. coli strains. Label-free proteomic analysis allowed the identification of virulence and drug resistance proteins that were unique to each of the clinical isolates compared in this study. The B subunit of Shiga toxin, ToxB, was uniquely detected in the STEC strain while several other virulence factors including SheA, OmpF, OmpC and OmpX were significantly more abundant in the STEC strain. The ciprofloxacin resistant EPEC isolate possessed reduced levels of key virulence proteins compared to the ciprofloxacin susceptible EPEC and STEC strains. Parallel reaction monitoring assays validated the presence of biologically relevant proteins across biologically-replicated cultures. Propagation of clinical isolates on a relevant solid medium followed by mass spectrometry analysis represents a convenient means to quantify virulence factors and drug resistance determinants that might otherwise be lost through extensive in vitro passage in enteropathogenic bacteria. SIGNIFICANCE: Through the use of quantitative proteomics, we have characterized the virulence and antimicrobial resistance attributes of three clinically isolated, pathogenic E. coli strains cultured on solid media. Our results provide new, quantitative data on the expressed proteomes of these tellurite-resistant, diarrhoeagenic E. coli strains and reveal a subset of antimicrobial resistance and virulence proteins that are differentially abundant between these clinical strains. Our quantitative proteomics-based approach should thus have applicability in microbiological diagnostic labs for the identification of pathogenic/drug resistant E. coli in the future.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Electron microscopy; Proteomics; Shiga-toxin-producing E. coli; Virulence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887208     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  4 in total

1.  The Integration of Proteomics and Metabolomics Data Paving the Way for a Better Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Microbial Acquired Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Suereta Fortuin; Nelson C Soares
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Characterisation of STEC and other diarrheic E. coli isolated on CHROMagar™STEC at a tertiary referral hospital, Cape Town.

Authors:  John Bosco Kalule; Karen H Keddy; Mark P Nicol
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.605

3.  Molecular characterization and phylogeny of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli derived from cattle farm.

Authors:  Shiqin Zhang; Zhiye Bai; Zichen Wang; Xiang Wang; Wen Wang; Hongmei Li; Qingli Dong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Quantification of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 protein abundance by high-throughput proteome.

Authors:  Wanderson Marques Da Silva; Jinlong Bei; Natalia Amigo; María Pía Valacco; Ariel Amadio; Qi Zhang; Xiuju Wu; Ting Yu; Mariano Larzabal; Zhuang Chen; Angel Cataldi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.