| Literature DB >> 28887191 |
Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espi1, Josefa Ibáñez2, Ana Molina-Barceló1, Elena Pérez2, Andreu Nolasco3, Rebeca Font4, Francisco Pérez-Riquelme5, Mariola de la Vega6, Eunate Arana-Arri7, MªElena Oceja8, Josep Alfons Espinàs4, Isabel Portillo9, Dolores Salas10.
Abstract
To analyze the sociodemographic and organizational factors influencing participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programs (CRCSP) in Spain, a retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of people invited to participate in the first 3 screening rounds of 6 CRCSP from 2000 to 2012. Mixed logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between sociodemographic and organizational factors, such as the type of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) used and the FOBT delivery type. The analysis was performed separately in groups (Initial screening-first invitation, Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders, Subsequent invitation-regular, Subsequent invitation-irregular intervals). The results showed that, in the Initial screening-first invitation group, participation was higher in women than in men in all age groups (OR 1.05 in persons aged 50-59years and OR 1.12 in those aged 60-69years). Participation was also higher when no action was required to receive the FOBT kit, independently of the type of screening (Initial screening-first invitation [OR 2.24], Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders [OR 2.14], Subsequent invitation-regular [OR 2.03], Subsequent invitation-irregular intervals [OR 9.38]) and when quantitative rather than qualitative immunological FOBT (FIT) was offered (Initial screening-first invitation [OR 0.70], Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders [OR 0.12], Subsequent invitation-regular [OR 0.20]) or guaiac testing (Initial screening-first invitation [OR 0.81], Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders [OR 0.88], Subsequent invitation-regular [OR 0.73]). In conclusion, the results of this study show that screening participation could be enhanced by inclusion of the FOBT kit with the screening invitation and the use of the quantitative FIT.Entities:
Keywords: CCR screening; FOBT; Participation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28887191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med ISSN: 0091-7435 Impact factor: 4.018