Literature DB >> 28887024

Are Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Continuing to Change? 2007-2015 Usage in a Large Database Cohort.

Nicholas A Bedard1, Robert A Burnett1, David E DeMik1, Yubo Gao1, Steve S Liu1, John J Callaghan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bearing surface issues related to trunnionosis or metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations have likely impacted recent trends in bearing surface choice. The purpose of this study is to evaluate trends in total hip arthroplasty (THA) bearing surface use, including 2015 data, with respect to the date of operation and patient demographics.
METHODS: The Humana dataset was reviewed from 2007 through 2015 to analyze bearing surface usage in primary THA. Four bearing surface types were identified by International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes and trended throughout the years: metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and MoM. Prevalence was analyzed as a function of age and sex.
RESULTS: Of the 28,504 primary THA procedures, the most commonly used bearing was MoP (46.1%), followed by CoP (33.2%), MoM (17.1%), and ceramic-on-ceramic (3.6%). The use of CoP bearings significantly increased from 6.4% in 2007 to 52.0% in 2015, while MoM bearings decreased during this period. MoP bearings decreased over 2012-2015 (P < .001). CoP usage decreased with age, while MoP bearings increased with a transition occurring at 65-69 years of age. Women were more likely to receive MoP bearings (odds ratio [OR] 1.2), while men were more likely to receive MoM and CoP bearings (OR 1.1). Multivariate logistic regression showed age to be an independent predictor of bearing surface choice with patients 65 and older more likely to receive MoP bearings (OR 3.2).
CONCLUSION: Bearing surface choice in primary THA has changed tremendously from 2007 to 2015. MoM bearing use has decreased as a result of adverse effects. Age continues to remain a significant factor in bearing surface choice.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bearing surface; ceramic on ceramic; metal on metal; polyethylene; total hip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887024     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Perioperative factors associated with increased length of stay after revision of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan H Garfinkel; Brian P Gladnick; Cole S Pachter; Niall H Cochrane; David W Romness
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-01-17

2.  Bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luigi Zagra; Enrico Gallazzi
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

3.  Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing vs ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene-bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head: a prospective cohort study with a mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Bin Feng; Yi Ren; Shiliang Cao; Jin Lin; Jin Jin; Wenwei Qian; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic vs. Ceramic-on-Polyethylene for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Xiaobin Shang; Yan Fang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 5.  Ten-year survival of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ihab Ibraheam El-Desouky; Albaraa Hassan Helal; Ali Mohamed Reda Mansour
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.