| Literature DB >> 28886714 |
Izabella Surowiec1, Sandra Gouveia-Figueira1, Judy Orikiiriza2,3,4, Elisabeth Lindquist5, Mari Bonde5, Jimmy Magambo4, Charles Muhinda4,6, Sven Bergström5,7,8, Johan Normark5,7,8,9, Johan Trygg10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxylipins and endocannabinoids are low molecular weight bioactive lipids that are crucial for initiation and resolution of inflammation during microbial infections. Metabolic complications in malaria are recognized contributors to severe and fatal malaria, but the impact of malaria infection on the production of small lipid derived signalling molecules is unknown. Knowledge of immunoregulatory patterns of these molecules in malaria is of great value for better understanding of the disease and improvement of treatment regimes, since the action of these classes of molecules is directly connected to the inflammatory response of the organism.Entities:
Keywords: Endocannabinoids; Malaria infection; Oxylipins; Plasmodium falciparum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28886714 PMCID: PMC5591560 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-2001-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Molecules included in the study organized in biosynthetic pathways of oxylipins in humans and coloured according to main types of enzymes involved in their synthesis from fatty acid precursors: CYP (green), COX (red) and LOX (yellow); in white compounds that were not analysed in this project; AA arachidonic acid, LA linoleic acid, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid, GLA gamma-linolenic acid. For the simplicity of the visualization not all reactions were included in the picture. With colour background are marked compounds analysed within this study. Pathways are based on KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) and BioCyc (http://www.biocyc.com/) databases
Fig. 2PCA score plot on oxylipin data with samples coloured according to their respective group: red dots signify severe malaria samples, blue dots uncomplicated malaria and green signify controls; x axis—t [1] first score (R2X = 0.316), y axis—t [2], second score (R2X = 0.170)
Analysis of oxylipins
| Compound | Abbreviation | Precursor | Pathway | OPLS-DA uncomplicated versus controls | p value uncomplicated versus controls | OPLS-DA severe versus controls | p value severe versus controls | OPLS-DA severe versus uncomplicated | p value severe versus uncomplicated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thromboxane B2 | TXB2 | AA | COX | − | < | − |
| 0.13 | NS |
| 9,12,13-trihydroxy-octadecenoic acid | 9,12,13-TriHOME | LA | 5-LOX | 0.36 | NS | 0.61 | 0.0022 | 0.31 | NS |
| 9,10,13-trihydroxy-octadecenoic acid | 9,10,13-TriHOME | LA | 5-LOX | 0.27 | NS | 0.61 | 0.0413 | 0.27 | NS |
| Prostaglandin F2aα | PGF2α | AA | COX | −0.10 | NS | 0.00 | 0.0056 | −0.02 | NS |
| Prostaglandin E2 | PGE2 | AA | COX | − | NS | −0.37 | 0.0180 | −0.19 | NS |
| Prostaglandin D2 | PGD2 | AA | COX | − | NS | −0.21 | 0.0428 | −0.03 | NS |
| Resolvin D2 | Resolvin D2 | DHA | 12/15-LOX | 0.07 | NS | −0.17 | NS | −0.28 | NS |
| Resolvin D1 | Resolvin D1 | DHA | 12/15-LOX | −0.32 | – | −0.16 | – | 0.25 | – |
| Lipoxin A4 | 5,6,-LXA4 | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.19 | NS | −0.10 | NS | −0.00 | NS |
| Trans-Leukotriene B4 | Trans-LTB4 | AA | 5-LOX | −0.12 | NS | 0.18 | NS | 0.15 | NS |
| Leukotriene B4 | LTB4 | AA | 5-LOX | −0.02 | NS |
| NS |
| NS |
| 12,13-dihydroxy-octadecenoic acid | 12,13-DiHOME | LA | CYP | 0.25 | NS | 0.34 | NS | 0.21 | NS |
| 9,10-dihydroxy-octadecenoic acid | 9,10-DiHOME | LA | CYP | 0.09 | NS | 0.34 | NS | 0.26 | NS |
| 14,15-dihydroxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 14,15-DHET | AA | CYP |
| NS | 0.58 | NS | −0.17 | NS |
| 11,12-dihydroxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 11,12-DHET | AA | CYP |
| NS | 0.40 | NS | −0.29 | NS |
| 8,9-dihydroxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 8,9-DHET | AA | CYP | 0.43 | NS | 0.21 | NS | −0.36 | NS |
| 5,6-dihydroxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 5,6-DHET | AA | CYP | −0.23 | 0.0054 | −0.26 | 0.0051 | − | NS |
| 12-hydroxy-eicosapentaenoic acid | 12-HEPE | EPA | 12/15-LOX | −0.33 | NS | −0.36 | NS | −0.47 | NS |
| 20-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 20-HETE | AA | CYP | 0.37 | 0.0017 | 0.27 | 0.0241 | −0.33 | NS |
| 13-hydroxy-octadecadienoic acid | 13-HODE | LA | 12/15-LOX | 0.06 | NS | 0.55 | NS | 0.58 | 0.0200 |
| 9-hydroxy-octadecadienoic acid | 9-HODE | LA | 5-LOX | 0.09 | NS | 0.55 | 0.0350 (*) | 0.57 | 0.0128 (*) |
| 15-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 15-HETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.38 | NS | −0.23 | 0.0402 | −0.25 | NS |
| 13-oxo-octadecadienoic acid | 13-oxo-ODE | LA | 12/15-LOX | 0.24 | NS | 0.51 | NS |
| 0.0464 |
| 11-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 11-HETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.37 | NS | −0.26 | NS | −0.19 | NS |
| 15-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid | 15-oxo-ETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.08 | NS | 0.29 | NS | 0.32 | NS |
| 12-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 12-HETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.37 | NS | −0.38 | 0.0079 | −0.47 | NS |
| 8-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 8-HETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.13 | NS | 0.02 | NS | −0.11 | NS |
| 15-hydroxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 15-HETrE | DGLA | 12/15-LOX | − | 0.0306 | −0.06 | NS | 0.11 | NS |
| 12-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid | 12-oxo-ETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | 0.01 | NS | −0.14 | NS | −0.51 | NS |
| 9-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 9-HETE | AA | 12/15-LOX | −0.28 | NS | −0.10 | NS | −0.10 | NS |
| 5-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid | 5-HETE | AA | 5-LOX | −0.14 | NS | −0.01 | NS | −0.03 | NS |
| 12(13)epoxy-octadecenoic acid | 12(13)-EpOME | LA | CYP |
| 0.0087 |
| 0.0017 | 0.38 | NS |
| 14(15)-epoxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 14(15)-EET | AA | CYP |
| NS | 0.60 | NS | 0.26 | NS |
| 9(10)epoxy-octadecenoic acid | 9(10)-EpOME | LA | CYP |
| 0.0107 |
| 0.0025 | 0.39 | NS |
| 11(12)-epoxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 11(12)-EET | AA | CYP | 0.32 | NS | 0.46 | NS |
| NS |
| 5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid | 5-oxo-ETE | AA | 5-LOX | 0.09 | NS | 0.27 | NS | 0.01 | NS |
| 8(9)-epoxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 8(9)-EET | AA | CYP |
| NS | 0.44 | NS | 0.25 | NS |
| 5(6)-epoxy-eicosatrienoic acid | 5(6)-EET | AA | CYP | 0.54 | NS | 0.48 | NS | 0.29 | NS |
p(corr) values from the OPLS-DA models between the studied groups of samples (the changes are presented in relation to infected individuals, with minus sign showing lower and plus sign depicting higher levels in infected individuals) and summary from the univariate t test analysis with Welch’s correction with p values provided for the compounds that showed significantly different levels (p < 0.05) between studied groups of samples; in italics are marked values significant according to the OPLS-DA models (jack-knifing confidence intervals) and according to t test with Bonferroni correction for p = 0.05 (0.00125)
AA arachidonic acid, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid, GLA gamma-linolenic acid, LA linoleic acid
* Non-parametric Mann–Whitney test
Fig. 3Predictive loading values (p(corr)) from the OPLS-DA oxylipin model between subjects infected with severe malaria and controls coloured according to the biochemical pathway (grey 5-LOX, black 12/15-LOX, violet COX, orange CYP); p(corr) values indicate if the metabolite is in higher or lower levels in severe malaria individuals compared with controls
Fig. 4Predictive loading values (p(corr)) from the OPLS-DA oxylipin model between subjects infected with severe malaria and uncomplicated malaria coloured according to the biochemical pathway (grey 5-LOX, black 12/15-LOX, violet COX, orange CYP); p(corr) values indicate if the metabolite is in higher or lower levels in severe malaria individuals compared with uncomplicated malaria
Fig. 5Receiver operator curves (ROC) for TXB2 comparing uncomplicated versus controls (green line) and severe versus controls (purple line). Youden score (<923.4 pM for uncomplicated vs controls and <609.5 pM for severe vs controls comparisons) is marked in bright green
Fig. 6PCA score plot on endocannabinoid data with samples coloured according to their respective group: red dots signify severe malaria samples, blue dots uncomplicated malaria and green signify controls; x axis—t [1] first score (R2X = 0.413), y axis—t [2], second score (R2X = 0.174)
Analysis of endocannabinoids
| Compound | Abbreviation | Fatty acid precursor | OPLS-DA uncomplicated versus controls | p value uncomplicated versus controls | OPLS-DA severe versus controls | p value severe versus controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Arachidonoyl glycerol | 2-AG | AA |
| 0.0048 |
|
|
| Arachidonoyl ethanolamide | AEA | AA | 0.20 | NS | 0.43 | NS |
| Oleoyl ethanolamide | OEA | OA |
| < |
| < |
| Palmitoyl ethanolamide | PEA | PA |
|
|
|
|
| Docosatetraenoyl ethanolamide | DEA | DTA |
|
|
|
|
| Arachidonoyl glycine | NAGLy | AA | −0.52 | NS |
| NS |
| Eicosapentaenoyl ethanolamide | EPEA | EPA |
|
|
|
|
| Docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide | DHEA | DHA |
| 0.0046 |
|
|
| Palmitoleoyl ethanolamide | POEA | PO | 0.57 | 0.0145 |
| 0.0224 |
| Linolenoyl ethanolamide | LEA | LA | 0.36 | NS | 0.26 | NS |
| Prostaglandin F2α ethanolamide | PGF2α EA | AA | −0.28 | NS | 0.02 | NS |
| Prostaglandin E2 ethanolamide | PGE2 EA | AA | 0.03 | NS | 0.15 | NS |
p(corr) values from the OPLS-DA models between the studied groups of samples (the changes are presented in relation to infected individuals, with minus sign showing lower and plus sign higher levels in infected individuals) and summary from the univariate t test analysis with Welch’s correction with p values provided for the compounds that showed significantly different levels (p < 0.05) between the studied groups of samples; in italics are marked values significant according to the OPLS-DA models and according to t test with Bonferroni correction (jack-knifing confidence intervals) for p = 0.05 (0.0042)
AA arachidonic acid, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, DTA docosatetraenoic acid, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid, LA linoleic acid, OA oleic acid, PA palmitic acid, PO palmitoleic acid
* Non-parametric Mann–Whitney test
Fig. 7Predictive loading values (p(corr)) from the OPLS-DA endocannabinoid model between subjects infected with severe malaria and controls; endocannabinoid species coloured according to their fatty acid precursor; p(corr) values indicate if the metabolite is in higher or lower levels in severe malaria individuals compared with controls
Fig. 8Endocannabinoids ROC curves significance. a The area under the ROC curve (mean ± SE) are plotted against the p values from the ROC analyses for all the endocannabinoids analysed in the groups uncomplicated malaria versus controls. The metabolites with the highest p value and area under the ROC curve (left to right) are: 2-AG, OEA, DEA, DHEA and PEA. b The same approach is presented for severe malaria versus control group with 2-AG, PEA and OEA with the highest p values. Both for a and b, the dotted line represents Bonferroni cut off (0.0042)