Guodong Chen1,2,3, Chang Wang1, Dicken Shiu-Chung Ko4, Jiang Qiu1, Xiaopeng Yuan1, Ming Han1, Changxi Wang1, Xiaoshun He1, Lizhong Chen1. 1. Organ Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China. 3. Organ Transplantation, Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are three categories of deceased donors of kidney transplantation in China, donation after brain death (DBD), donation after circulatory death (DCD), and donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) donors. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation from these three categories of deceased donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 469 recipients who received deceased kidney transplantation in our hospital from February 2007 to June 2015. The recipients were divided into three groups according to the source of their donor kidneys: DBD, DCD, or DBCD. The primary endpoints were delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient death. RESULTS: The warm ischemia time was much longer in DCD group compared to DBCD group (18.4 minutes vs 12.9 minutes, P < .001). DGF rate was higher in DCD group than in DBD and DBCD groups (22.5% vs 10.2% and 13.8%, respectively, P = .021). Urinary leakage was much higher in DCD group (P = .049). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survivals were all comparable among the three groups. CONCLUSION: DBCD kidney transplantation has lower incidences of DGF and urinary leakage than DCD kidney transplant. However, the overall patient and graft survival were comparable among DBD, DCD, and DBCD kidney transplantation.
BACKGROUND: There are three categories of deceased donors of kidney transplantation in China, donation after brain death (DBD), donation after circulatory death (DCD), and donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) donors. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation from these three categories of deceased donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 469 recipients who received deceased kidney transplantation in our hospital from February 2007 to June 2015. The recipients were divided into three groups according to the source of their donor kidneys: DBD, DCD, or DBCD. The primary endpoints were delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient death. RESULTS: The warm ischemia time was much longer in DCD group compared to DBCD group (18.4 minutes vs 12.9 minutes, P < .001). DGF rate was higher in DCD group than in DBD and DBCD groups (22.5% vs 10.2% and 13.8%, respectively, P = .021). Urinary leakage was much higher in DCD group (P = .049). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survivals were all comparable among the three groups. CONCLUSION:DBCD kidney transplantation has lower incidences of DGF and urinary leakage than DCD kidney transplant. However, the overall patient and graft survival were comparable among DBD, DCD, and DBCD kidney transplantation.
Keywords:
donation after brain death; donation after brain death followed by circulatory death; donation after circulatory death; kidney transplantation
Authors: Jan Roman; František Jalůvka; Petr Ostruszka; Petr Jelínek; Ján Hrubovčák; Pavel Havránek; Adéla Vrtková; Zdeněk Lys; Jarmila Dědochová; Václav Procházka Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2022-07-04
Authors: Aled Jones; Jennifer Holmes; Michael Stephens; John Geen; John Williams; Kieron Donovan; Aled O Phillips Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Nicholas V Mendez; Yehuda Raveh; Joshua J Livingstone; Gaetano Ciancio; Giselle Guerra; George W Burke Iii; Vadim B Shatz; Fouad G Souki; Linda J Chen; Mahmoud Morsi; Jose M Figueiro; Tony M Ibrahim; Werviston L DeFaria; Ramona Nicolau-Raducu Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2021-04-18
Authors: Alexandr Reznik; Olga Plotnikova; Andrey Skvortsov; Mikhail Skoblov; Oleg Reznik; Ancha Baranova Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.411