Wendy B London1, Rochelle Bagatell2, Brenda J Weigel3, Elizabeth Fox2, Dongjing Guo4, Collin Van Ryn5,6, Arlene Naranjo5,6, Julie R Park7,8. 1. Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 4. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 6. Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Gainesville, Florida. 7. Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington. 8. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early-phase trials in patients with recurrent neuroblastoma historically used an objective "response" of measureable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST], without bone/bone marrow assessment) to select agents for further study. Historical cohorts may be small and potentially biased; to the authors' knowledge, disease recurrence studies from international registries are outdated. Using a large recent cohort of patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma from Children's Oncology Group (COG) modern-era early-phase trials, the authors determined outcome and quantified parameters for designing future studies. METHODS: The first early-phase COG trial enrollment (sequential) of 383 distinct patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma on 23 phase 1, 3 phase 1/2, and 9 phase 2 trials (August 2002 to January 2014) was analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to disease progression (TTP). Planned frontline therapy for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma included hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (approximately two-thirds of patients underwent ≥1 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation); 13.2% of patients received dinutuximab. RESULTS: From the time of the patient's first early-phase trial enrollment (383 patients), the 1-year and 4-year PFS rates ( ± standard error) were 21% ± 2% and 6% ± 1%, respectively, whereas the 1-year and 4-year OS rates were 57% ± 3% and 20% ± 2%, respectively. The median TTP was 58 days (interquartile range, 31-183 days [350 patients]); the median follow-up was 25.3 months (33 patients were found to be without disease recurrence/progression). The median time from diagnosis to first disease recurrence/progression was 18.7 months (range, 1.4-64.8 months) (176 patients). MYCN amplification and 11q loss of heterozygosity were prognostic of worse PFS and OS (P = .003 and P<.0001, respectively, and P = .02 and P = .03, respectively) after early-phase trial enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: This recent COG cohort of patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma is inclusive and representative. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first meta-analysis of PFS, TTP, and OS within the context of modern therapy. These results will inform the design of future phase 2 studies by providing a) historical context during the search for more effective agents; and, b) factors prognostic of PFS and OS after disease recurrence to stratify randomization. Cancer 2017;123:4914-23.
BACKGROUND: Early-phase trials in patients with recurrent neuroblastoma historically used an objective "response" of measureable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST], without bone/bone marrow assessment) to select agents for further study. Historical cohorts may be small and potentially biased; to the authors' knowledge, disease recurrence studies from international registries are outdated. Using a large recent cohort of patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma from Children's Oncology Group (COG) modern-era early-phase trials, the authors determined outcome and quantified parameters for designing future studies. METHODS: The first early-phase COG trial enrollment (sequential) of 383 distinct patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma on 23 phase 1, 3 phase 1/2, and 9 phase 2 trials (August 2002 to January 2014) was analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and time to disease progression (TTP). Planned frontline therapy for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma included hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (approximately two-thirds of patients underwent ≥1 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation); 13.2% of patients received dinutuximab. RESULTS: From the time of the patient's first early-phase trial enrollment (383 patients), the 1-year and 4-year PFS rates ( ± standard error) were 21% ± 2% and 6% ± 1%, respectively, whereas the 1-year and 4-year OS rates were 57% ± 3% and 20% ± 2%, respectively. The median TTP was 58 days (interquartile range, 31-183 days [350 patients]); the median follow-up was 25.3 months (33 patients were found to be without disease recurrence/progression). The median time from diagnosis to first disease recurrence/progression was 18.7 months (range, 1.4-64.8 months) (176 patients). MYCN amplification and 11q loss of heterozygosity were prognostic of worse PFS and OS (P = .003 and P<.0001, respectively, and P = .02 and P = .03, respectively) after early-phase trial enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: This recent COG cohort of patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma is inclusive and representative. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first meta-analysis of PFS, TTP, and OS within the context of modern therapy. These results will inform the design of future phase 2 studies by providing a) historical context during the search for more effective agents; and, b) factors prognostic of PFS and OS after disease recurrence to stratify randomization. Cancer 2017;123:4914-23.
Authors: Suzanne Shusterman; Wendy B London; Stephen D Gillies; Jacquelyn A Hank; Stephan D Voss; Robert C Seeger; C Patrick Reynolds; Jennifer Kimball; Mark R Albertini; Barrett Wagner; Jacek Gan; Jens Eickhoff; Kenneth B DeSantes; Susan L Cohn; Toby Hecht; Brian Gadbaw; Ralph A Reisfeld; John M Maris; Paul M Sondel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Rani E George; Wendy B London; Susan L Cohn; John M Maris; Cynthia Kretschmar; Lisa Diller; Garrett M Brodeur; Robert P Castleberry; A Thomas Look Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edward F Attiyeh; Wendy B London; Yael P Mossé; Qun Wang; Cynthia Winter; Deepa Khazi; Patrick W McGrady; Robert C Seeger; A Thomas Look; Hiroyuki Shimada; Garrett M Brodeur; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay; John M Maris Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Veronica Moroz; David Machin; Andreas Faldum; Barbara Hero; Tomoko Iehara; Veronique Mosseri; Ruth Ladenstein; Bruno De Bernardi; Hervé Rubie; Frank Berthold; Katherine K Matthay; Tom Monclair; Peter F Ambros; Andrew D J Pearson; Susan L Cohn; Wendy B London Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Wendy B London; Luca Boni; Thorsten Simon; Frank Berthold; Clare Twist; Mary Lou Schmidt; Robert P Castleberry; Katherine K Matthay; Susan L Cohn; Bruno De Bernardi Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2005-10-18 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Jennifer Schneiderman; Wendy B London; Garrett M Brodeur; Robert P Castleberry; A Thomas Look; Susan L Cohn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G M Brodeur; J Pritchard; F Berthold; N L Carlsen; V Castel; R P Castelberry; B De Bernardi; A E Evans; M Favrot; F Hedborg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1976-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sarah B Whittle; Valeria Smith; Allison Silverstein; Margaret Parmeter; Charles G Minard; M Brooke Bernhardt; Peter E Zage; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Jed G Nuchtern; Andras Heczey; Heidi V Russell; Jason M Shohet; Jennifer H Foster Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Julie R Park; Susan G Kreissman; Wendy B London; Arlene Naranjo; Susan Lerner Cohn; Michael D Hogarty; Sheena C Tenney; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Peter John Shaw; Jacqueline M Kraveka; Stephen S Roberts; James Duncan Geiger; John J Doski; Stephan D Voss; John M Maris; Stephan A Grupp; Lisa Diller Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Irene Y Cheung; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Shakeel Modak; Audrey Mauguen; Yi Feng; Ellen Basu; Stephen S Roberts; Govind Ragupathi; Brian H Kushner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karolina Łuczkowska; Katarzyna Ewa Sokolowska; Tomasz K Wojdacz; Bogusław Machaliński; Olga Taryma-Lesniak; Krzysztof Pastuszak; Anna Supernat; Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm; Lise Lotte Hansen; Edyta Paczkowska Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Giselle L Saulnier Sholler; William Ferguson; Genevieve Bergendahl; Jeffrey P Bond; Kathleen Neville; Don Eslin; Valerie Brown; William Roberts; Randal K Wada; Javier Oesterheld; Deanna Mitchell; Jessica Foley; Nehal S Parikh; Francis Eshun; Peter Zage; Jawhar Rawwas; Susan Sencer; Debra Pankiewicz; Monique Quinn; Maria Rich; Joseph Junewick; Jacqueline M Kraveka Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 4.379