Literature DB >> 28885673

Reproducibility and normal values of static pupil diameters.

Simon Schröder1, Ekaterina Chashchina1, Edgar Janunts1, Alan Cayless2, Achim Langenbucher1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide additional information on normal values of static pupil diameter measurements for binocular infrared pupillometry with PupilX, a commercial pupillometer, and assess the reproducibility of this device's measurements.
METHODS: The pupil diameters from 91 study participants with normal eyes with an average age of 39.7 years (SD 16.4 years) were measured with PupilX under scotopic (0 lx), mesopic (1 lx), and photopic (16 lx) illumination. To assess the repeatability of the device, each measurement was repeated 5 times.
RESULTS: The mean pupil diameters were 6.5 mm (SD 1.3 mm), 5.5 mm (SD 1.2 mm), and 4.03 mm (SD 0.9 mm) under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic illumination. Left and right eyes showed no difference in mean pupil diameters. The mean unsigned anisocoria was 0.26 mm (SD 0.32 mm) under scotopic, 0.26 mm (SD 0.27 mm) under mesopic, and 0.19 mm (SD 0.19 mm) under photopic illumination. The decrease in pupil diameter with age was largest for scotopic (≈0.057 mm/y) and smallest for photopic illumination (≈0.025 mm/y). The repeatability of the pupillometer was better than 0.2 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides reference values for age- and light-related pupil diameters measured with the PupilX digital pupillometer in normal subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Brightness; Normal values; Pupillometry; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28885673     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5001027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  5 in total

1.  Predictive value of pupillography on intraoperative floppy iris syndrome in preoperative period.

Authors:  Gozde Sahin Vural; Mehmet Vural
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of corneal elevation and pachymetry measurements made by two state of the art corneal tomographers with different measurement principles.

Authors:  Simon Schröder; Achim Langenbucher; Jens Schrecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of static and dynamic Pupillometry changes in men using Silodosin for benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Authors:  Umut Karaca; Engin Kaya; Onder Ayyildiz; Gokhan Ozge; Murat Kucukevcilioglu; Gulsah Usta; Fatih Mehmet Mutlu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Contactless optical coherence tomography of the eyes of freestanding individuals with a robotic scanner.

Authors:  Mark Draelos; Pablo Ortiz; Ruobing Qian; Christian Viehland; Ryan McNabb; Kris Hauser; Anthony N Kuo; Joseph A Izatt
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 29.234

5.  Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jakaria Mostafa; Jason Porter; Hope M Queener; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.